Thanks Rob - I'll look at that too.
John Coyle
Brisbane, Australia
- Original Message -
From: Digital Image Studio [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List pdml@pdml.net
Sent: Sunday, January 14, 2007 9:53 PM
Subject: Re: Monitor Calibration - help wanted
On 13/01/07, John Coyle
On 13/01/07, John Coyle [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Rob, thanks for suggesting the Registry - I'm comfortable using RegEdit, so
I'll have a wander through there too. There is nothing in my startup
settings that would appear to affect only Adobe's colour rendering.
Fair enough, the LUT update
John
Don't know if this will help but I find both the foillowing links useful,
particularly the gamma charts in the first link.
http://www.photoscientia.co.uk/Gamma.htm
http://www.normankoren.com/makingfineprints1A.html
Cheers
Brian
++
Brian Walters
Western
On 12/01/07, John Coyle [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I recently did a recalibration of my desktop monitor: can't remember nor
find the program I used to do it, and now the results are not acceptable (in
fact, I'm getting on-screen displays that look OK in Photoshop CS, but are
quite different in
Brian Walters wrote:
John
Don't know if this will help but I find both the foillowing links
useful, particularly the gamma charts in the first link.
http://www.photoscientia.co.uk/Gamma.htm
but pls. remeber to use gamma 2.2 , as this is the standard. Gamma 1.8
is used only by old Macs
On Jan 12, 2007, at 10:46 AM, Bronek Kozicki wrote:
Brian Walters wrote:
John
Don't know if this will help but I find both the foillowing links
useful, particularly the gamma charts in the first link.
http://www.photoscientia.co.uk/Gamma.htm
but pls. remeber to use gamma 2.2 , as this
Bronek Kozicki wrote:
Brian Walters wrote:
John
Don't know if this will help but I find both the foillowing links
useful, particularly the gamma charts in the first link.
http://www.photoscientia.co.uk/Gamma.htm
but pls. remeber to use gamma 2.2 , as this is the standard.
For whom? For
On 13/01/07, keith_w [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Bronek Kozicki wrote:
Brian Walters wrote:
John
Don't know if this will help but I find both the foillowing links
useful, particularly the gamma charts in the first link.
http://www.photoscientia.co.uk/Gamma.htm
but pls. remeber to
keith_w wrote:
but pls. remeber to use gamma 2.2 , as this is the standard.
For whom? For what?
good question. You will find answer in Color Management by Bruce
Fraser, Chris Murphy, Fred Bunting. In my (2nd) edition it is in
chapter 6 . Needless to say, gamma 2.2 is recommended (there)
I run Gamma 2.2 on my Mac with Apple cinema display. The monitor is
calibrated with a Spyder 2. My new Epson R2400 duplicates the screen
image flawlessly as did my previous Epson 2200. I don't see that
there's anything to be gained using G 1.8.
Paul
On Jan 12, 2007, at 6:07 PM, Bronek
Thanks to all who responded, and I'll have some fun next week checking out
all the suggestions (got to go to a christening tomorrow...).
Brian, I downloaded one of the recommended test prints from digitaldog,
thanks for the link, and it looks perfect on my monitor in Vueprint and in
Photoshop:
I recently did a recalibration of my desktop monitor: can't remember nor
find the program I used to do it, and now the results are not acceptable (in
fact, I'm getting on-screen displays that look OK in Photoshop CS, but are
quite different in other viewers, and in print).
I've spent some time
12 matches
Mail list logo
