>On 6/18/06, Joseph Tainter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> Don, Noise Ninja produces custom profiles for different cameras, at
>> different ISO levels,
You can download Neat Image profiles for the DS.
All ISO settings and three noise filter settings. Quite useful when ther
h any sharpened pictures -- this is not so important I
suppose. For unknown reasons JAlbum introduces terrible 'film grainy'
looking noise if any of the pictures included have been sharpened (I use
a little unsharp masking sometimes). Neat image cleans this up
immediately after auto
On 6/18/06, Joseph Tainter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Don, Noise Ninja produces custom profiles for different cameras, at
> different ISO levels, which I though sensible. I don't know how it
> compares to most others, except that it does soften less than Digital GEM.
>
> I don't know how long it
Don, Noise Ninja produces custom profiles for different cameras, at
different ISO levels, which I though sensible. I don't know how it
compares to most others, except that it does soften less than Digital GEM.
I don't know how long it will take the Noise Ninja producers to come out
with a profi
/17/06, Don Williams <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I'm contemplating getting the Pro version of one of these programs and
> would like to hear user's opinions. I've used the free version of Neat
> Image and it works pretty, well but will only save images as JPEG files.
&g
I'm contemplating getting the Pro version of one of these programs and
would like to hear user's opinions. I've used the free version of Neat
Image and it works pretty, well but will only save images as JPEG files.
I know nothing about Noise Ninja.
Don
--
Dr E D F Williams
OK, I guess I wasn't paying attention when that thread was being discussed and now
that I want to find it, it's nowhere to be found on the archive.
Anyway, what size of print was ultimately decided? I want to create up to a 6x9 print
and need to know if I can use a 3MP or if I need to go up t
"Sam Jost" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>Bwa, I found the free version of neat image can only save jpg files, and not
>at a very high quality that - after using neat image on my pictures I had no
>noise anymore, but compression artefacts instead :(
>
>I'll try
with scans from my old
Minolta Dimâge.
Jostein
Quoting Sam Jost <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> Bwa, I found the free version of neat image can only save jpg files, and not
>
> at a very high quality that - after using neat image on my pictures I had no
>
> noise anymore, but com
Bwa, I found the free version of neat image can only save jpg files, and not
at a very high quality that - after using neat image on my pictures I had no
noise anymore, but compression artefacts instead :(
I'll try Helicon next...
Sam
- Original Message -
From: "Albano Garci
nd a great, free soft: Neat Image.
If you didn't tryed it, give it a chance. It's very
good, you can build your own noise profiles and
control the full process. Try it!
Regards
Albano
--- Cotty <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On 21/10/04, Cotty, discombobulated, unleash
Neat Image can't work miracles (particularly in the case of 3200ISO shadow
noise) however it does quite a good job when used with custom noise profiles.
At the link below are a copy of my current custom noise profiles for the *ist
D, they aren't perfect but they seem to get the job d
r, or, most of
the time, close without saving.
Bill
- Original Message -
From: "Butch Black" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Saturday, December 13, 2003 1:46 PM
Subject: Re: Neat Image
> Nice Bill.
>
> Question. The after picture looks sli
Nice Bill.
Question. The after picture looks slightly softer then the before picture.
Have you tried adding a little unsharp mask after using NI? If so does it
cancel the noise reduction?
Butch
Each man had only one genuine vocation - to find the way to himself.
Hermann Hesse (Demian)
> -Original Message-
> From: Dave Miers [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
>
>
> I dunno about the rest of you, but I note a considerable
> loss of detail in
> the altered image.
Well, that's sort of what it does. Noise obscures what's there, NI
sort of smooth things out.
I tested it for a littl
L PROTECTED]>
Sent: Friday, December 12, 2003 8:49 PM
Subject: Re: Neat Image
>
> > IMO, the home edition is easily worth $30.00. I've only been using it a
> > couple of days, so I'm still learning. Doing one image at a time, it's
no
> > speed demon, but I&
> IMO, the home edition is easily worth $30.00. I've only been using it a
> couple of days, so I'm still learning. Doing one image at a time, it's no
> speed demon, but I'm not terribly interested in speed any way and the
> results look fine to me. I've uploaded a 100% istD crop of one of the
ph
Doug,
Version 3.0 runs faster. Only a minute or two on my istD images. My
machine though is a P4 2.6Ghz
Bill
- Original Message -
From: "Doug Franklin" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Friday, December 12, 2003 8:34 PM
Subject: Re: Neat Image
TED]>
Sent: Friday, December 12, 2003 7:41 PM
Subject: Neat Image
> Hey Bill Owens:
>
> Tell us some more about "Neat Image". Is it worth the money? What other
> software did you consider for noise/grain removal, etc. I am thinking of
> getting "Neat Image" and any help would be appreciated.
>
> Larry
>
>
19 matches
Mail list logo
