Yeah, I really like their projection on the 8mm. Its probably one of
the best projections out there. The 10-20 I used was indeed the
variable aperture one. Compared to my 12-24, there's just no contest.
On Sat, Dec 7, 2013 at 9:15 PM, Rob Studdert wrote:
> I have their 8mm, it's actually a nice o
I have their 8mm, it's actually a nice optic, it's not strictly
fish-eye either. It's has a stereographic projection which translates
to less objectionable distortion in the corners than a regular
fish-eye and when used to shoot multi-image panos a better stitch.
On 8 December 2013 06:27, Zos Xavi
Might depend on which Sigma 10-20 you had. There are two versions. I
think the f/4-f/5.6 version is supposed to be a (teeny-tiny) little bit
sharper than the constant aperture f/3.5 version.
On 12/7/2013 10:32 AM, Jos from Holland wrote:
Hm, maybe I had a bad copy, but my Sigma 10-20 gave me so
The problem with their lenses is really build quality. They have
really good optics, no doubt about that (especially for the cost), but
if you look at lensrentals repair list they are all at the top. If
they started making nice metal bodied primes, a lot more people would
take them more seriously.
On Sun, Dec 08, 2013 at 02:24:16AM +1100, Rob Studdert wrote:
> The edges aren't that bad on the Sigma 10-20/3.5, they are better than
> the Sigma 14/2.8 and the old Pentax A15/3.5. At 10mm wide open it's a
> soft right at the extremes but generally if it needs to be used wide
> open then light is
I think my 15 mm is wide enough for me, though this lens is impressive.
On 12/6/2013 7:13 AM, Igor Roshchin wrote:
A new fast wide-angle rectilinear lens will be available soon for Pentax
cameras: 10/2.8 from Samyang. Unfortunately, it will have only manual focus.
It's also relatively heavy
Its possible the copy I used was bad. The edges looks awful. My Pentax
12-24 is razor sharp across the frame at f11. I have no need to go
wider or faster.
On Sat, Dec 7, 2013 at 10:32 AM, Jos from Holland
wrote:
> Hm, maybe I had a bad copy, but my Sigma 10-20 gave me so many "just not
> sharp" p
Hm, maybe I had a bad copy, but my Sigma 10-20 gave me so many "just not
sharp" pictures. Now I have the 8-16mm, and it is so nice, sharp, and
8mm is so much more than 10mm when looking for extremes...
Greetz, Jos
On 7-12-2013 16:24, Rob Studdert wrote:
The edges aren't that bad on the Sigma 1
The edges aren't that bad on the Sigma 10-20/3.5, they are better than
the Sigma 14/2.8 and the old Pentax A15/3.5. At 10mm wide open it's a
soft right at the extremes but generally if it needs to be used wide
open then light is poor anyhow and the image doesn't suffer for the
lack of edge sharpnes
I'm not a big fan of the sigma WA zooms. The edges on the 10-20 aren't
great IMO.
On Fri, Dec 6, 2013 at 11:39 PM, Rob Studdert wrote:
> It looks mildly interesting, unless you have a Sigma 10-20/3.5 which
> is no optical slouch, is less than a stop slower, provides a more
> versatile focal lengt
It looks mildly interesting, unless you have a Sigma 10-20/3.5 which
is no optical slouch, is less than a stop slower, provides a more
versatile focal length range, has HSM focus which allows full manual
override and is cheaper.
On 6 December 2013 16:13, Igor Roshchin wrote:
>
>
> A new fast wi
On Dec 6, 2013, at 6:13 pm, Igor Roshchin wrote:
> A new fast wide-angle rectilinear lens will be available soon for Pentax
> cameras: 10/2.8 from Samyang. Unfortunately, it will have only manual focus.
> It's also relatively heavy...
> It might of interest to some people here.
>
> http://www.
Bill,
Yes, same double row of grip bumps on the DA*55/1.4 and DFA50/2.8 Macro also.
Think they have an overstock of the grip rubber or molds???
Regards, Bob S.
On Fri, Dec 6, 2013 at 11:40 AM, Bill wrote:
> On 06/12/2013 11:33 AM, Bob Sullivan wrote:
>>
>> Igor,
>> It makes me wonder if Samyang
Bill wrote:
>On 06/12/2013 11:37 AM, Zos Xavius wrote:
>> All their lenses are A mount IIRC. I wouldn't worry too much.
>>
>It's being listed as a KaF. The mount shown in the picture is a Nikon
>mount, which doesn't have an "A" setting.
>
>bill
All their Pentax lenses have been KA mount. Contac
On 06/12/2013 11:37 AM, Zos Xavius wrote:
All their lenses are A mount IIRC. I wouldn't worry too much.
It's being listed as a KaF. The mount shown in the picture is a Nikon
mount, which doesn't have an "A" setting.
bill
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman
On 06/12/2013 11:33 AM, Bob Sullivan wrote:
Igor,
It makes me wonder if Samyang isn't manufacturing lenses for Ricoh & us.
Regards, Bob S.
Check out the family resemblance between the DA*55/1.4 and this Samyang.
Pay particular attention to the cover on the focus ring.
bill
--
PDML Pentax-D
All their lenses are A mount IIRC. I wouldn't worry too much.
On Fri, Dec 6, 2013 at 12:33 PM, Bob Sullivan wrote:
> Igor,
> It makes me wonder if Samyang isn't manufacturing lenses for Ricoh & us.
> Regards, Bob S.
>
> On Fri, Dec 6, 2013 at 10:52 AM, Igor Roshchin wrote:
>>
>>
>> :-)
>>
>> Na
Igor,
It makes me wonder if Samyang isn't manufacturing lenses for Ricoh & us.
Regards, Bob S.
On Fri, Dec 6, 2013 at 10:52 AM, Igor Roshchin wrote:
>
>
> :-)
>
> Nano-shmano..., - says a professor in nano-materials.
>
>
> Those are not red bands, but just very small (micro-? nano-?) red turbans
On 06/12/2013 11:17 AM, CollinB wrote:
The pic looks like it is M mount and not A. Alas.
It looks like they are releasing it in 10 different mounts, what's the
problem?
bill
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the
The pic looks like it is M mount and not A. Alas.
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow
the directions.
:-)
Nano-shmano..., - says a professor in nano-materials.
Those are not red bands, but just very small (micro-? nano-?) red turbans.
That's a secret sign of the descendants of Red Turban troops stuck
in Korea since 1360.
They might have some emissaries embedded in Ricoh.
;-)
Igor
Fri Dec 6
And look, it has nano coatings and that red band on the barrel just
like the newest Pentax lenses.
Regards, Bob S.
On Thu, Dec 5, 2013 at 11:13 PM, Igor Roshchin wrote:
>
>
> A new fast wide-angle rectilinear lens will be available soon for Pentax
> cameras: 10/2.8 from Samyang. Unfortunately,
f2.8 @ 10mm doesn't come lightly. 1.5lbs really isn't all that heavy
though. I'm very intrigued by this lens!
On Fri, Dec 6, 2013 at 12:46 AM, Larry Colen wrote:
> Vey interesting.
>
> Igor Roshchin wrote:
>>
>>
>>A new fast wide-angle rectilinear lens will be available soon for
>>Pentax
>>c
Vey interesting.
Igor Roshchin wrote:
>
>
>A new fast wide-angle rectilinear lens will be available soon for
>Pentax
>cameras: 10/2.8 from Samyang. Unfortunately, it will have only manual
>focus.
>It's also relatively heavy...
>It might of interest to some people here.
>
>http://www.dprevie
That really is quite interesting. I would have hoped that Pentax would
produce something in this focal length as they are still all aps-c.
On 12/6/2013 12:13 AM, Igor Roshchin wrote:
A new fast wide-angle rectilinear lens will be available soon for Pentax
cameras: 10/2.8 from Samyang. Unfort
A new fast wide-angle rectilinear lens will be available soon for Pentax
cameras: 10/2.8 from Samyang. Unfortunately, it will have only manual focus.
It's also relatively heavy...
It might of interest to some people here.
http://www.dpreview.com/news/2013/12/06/samyang-announces-10mm-f2-8-manu
26 matches
Mail list logo