>The one feature I always felt that the 645n lacked has not been added,
>namely: Interchangeable Film Backs!
I guess it's because if this feature was added, the body size would be
"added" as well.
regards,
Alan Chan
_
Get your FRE
--- Alan Chan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >The one feature I always felt that the 645n lacked
> has not been added,
> >namely: Interchangeable Film Backs!
>
> I guess it's because if this feature was added, the
> body size would be
> "added" as well.
And price.
Andreas Wirtz
Listen to you
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
> I could live with a larger body.
Thing is, part of the attraction of the 645n is its small size. Give it
interchangeable backs and its just like any other 645. Plus, you can
still preload inserts for quick film changes, you just can't change
mid-roll without wastin
Patrick wrote:
I could live with a larger body. I think advantages of
having an interchangeable back far outweighs the
disadvantage of the extra bulk. Just think of the
possibilities switching film types quickly, fast
reloading without having to fiddle with film, digital
backs (I
4 matches
Mail list logo
