P. J. Alling wrote:
It would also have been futile, M lenses don't auto focus...
Focus confirmation, dear boy. Very ap(se)t in a church.
On 9/11/2010 10:31 PM, John Sessoms wrote:
"*The flash does not discharge when using the AF540FGZ spotbeam
exclusively as a focusing aid." (AF540FGZ ma
It would also have been futile, M lenses don't auto focus...
On 9/11/2010 10:31 PM, John Sessoms wrote:
"*The flash does not discharge when using the AF540FGZ spotbeam
exclusively as a focusing aid." (AF540FGZ manual - p56)
From: "P. J. Alling"
Which would have kind of defeated the purpose
"*The flash does not discharge when using the AF540FGZ spotbeam
exclusively as a focusing aid." (AF540FGZ manual - p56)
From: "P. J. Alling"
Which would have kind of defeated the purpose when making this...
http://dl.dropbox.com/u/1604247/PESO/PESO%20--%20%20prayerserviceatstmichaels.html
Which would have kind of defeated the purpose when making this...
http://dl.dropbox.com/u/1604247/PESO/PESO%20--%20%20prayerserviceatstmichaels.html
On 9/11/2010 8:48 PM, John Sessoms wrote:
Just mount your AF540FGZ on the camera's hot-shoe and set the function
to "Spotbeam".
From: "P. J.
On Sep 11, 2010, at 11:38, P. J. Alling wrote:
> With fast lenses the newer cameras can pretty much see in the dark. Too bad
> Pentax cameras can't focus in the dark.
>
I was in a dark bar last night discussing cameras with a guy who had an Olympus
PEN. He was having focus problems, too - so
Just mount your AF540FGZ on the camera's hot-shoe and set the function
to "Spotbeam".
From: "P. J. Alling"
With fast lenses the newer cameras can pretty much see in the dark.
Too bad Pentax cameras can't focus in the dark.
On 9/11/2010 12:25PM, Steven Desjardins wrote:
>> > " At 25600 it loo
2010/9/11 P. J. Alling :
>
> With fast lenses the newer cameras can pretty much see in the dark. Too
> bad Pentax cameras can't focus in the dark.
soft darkness looks much nicer though... think of it as night bokeh...
Cheers
Ecke
-
Cameras don’t shoot pe
With fast lenses the newer cameras can pretty much see in the dark.
Too bad Pentax cameras can't focus in the dark.
On 9/11/2010 12:25 PM, Steven Desjardins wrote:
" At 25600 it looks about the same as my
old *istD at 1600, so I can at least stand by my second point. :)"
John,
Your wisdom
" At 25600 it looks about the same as my
old *istD at 1600, so I can at least stand by my second point. :)"
John,
Your wisdom is an inspiration to us all. ;-) The high iso stuff is
amazing, isn't it? Glad I held onto my slow lenses.
Your humble servant,
Steve Desjardins
--
PDML Pentax-Disc
There's really no point in asking this question right now. They've only
just announced the cameras, no one's gotten their hands on them, much
less
tested them.
Get with the times, John :-)
Wow, I had no idea. Did someone already post that here and I just missed
it? The noise levels look
On 9/11/2010 9:03 AM, David J Brooks wrote:
On Fri, Sep 10, 2010 at 10:26 PM, Tanya Love wrote:
Does anyone know if any work has been done on upgrading the sensors in the
new bodies to avoid noise?
Shoot in a forest.??
:-)
Dave
But then you'll hear the trees fall...
--
"His lack of educa
On Fri, Sep 10, 2010 at 10:26 PM, Tanya Love wrote:
> Does anyone know if any work has been done on upgrading the sensors in the
> new bodies to avoid noise?
Shoot in a forest.??
:-)
Dave
--
Documenting Life in Rural Ontario.
www.caughtinmotion.com
http://brooksinthecountry.blogspot.com/
York
On Fri, Sep 10, 2010 at 10:26 PM, Tanya Love wrote:
> Does anyone know if any work has been done on upgrading the sensors in the
> new bodies to avoid noise? Like seriously, if I didn't have noise reduction
> in LR these days, I'd be trashing a LOT of my stuff - something I never had
> to do with
On 11 September 2010 01:26, John Celio wrote:
>
> There's really no point in asking this question right now. They've only
> just announced the cameras, no one's gotten their hands on them, much less
> tested them.
Get with the times, John :-)
Some K-r samples. First, comparisons at all ISOs:
Does anyone know if any work has been done on upgrading the sensors in the
new bodies to avoid noise? Like seriously, if I didn't have noise
reduction
in LR these days, I'd be trashing a LOT of my stuff - something I never
had
to do with the *istD.
There's really no point in asking this que
I'm certain that the K5 will show considerably less high ISO noise than the
K7. However, I find that when exposures are accurate, noise with the k7 isn't
objectionable up to ISO 800 or even 1600. For some purposes, like concert pics,
3200 is just fine.
I expect that the K5 will soon be my main
Does anyone know if any work has been done on upgrading the sensors in the
new bodies to avoid noise? Like seriously, if I didn't have noise reduction
in LR these days, I'd be trashing a LOT of my stuff - something I never had
to do with the *istD.
I need a second body very soon and was going to
17 matches
Mail list logo
