http://www.nikon-image.com/jpn/products/camera/slr/digital/d300/sample.htm
That raises one question. Is it wort it? I seen Pentax K10D perform
better than that and with more contrasty situations rather than
carefully weighted studio lighting for this Harley Davidson set...
--
PDML Pentax-Disc
- Original Message -
From: "Roman" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To:
Sent: Friday, September 14, 2007 12:56 PM
Subject: Nikon D300 sample photos
> http://www.nikon-image.com/jpn/products/camera/slr/digital/d300/sample.htm
> That raises one question. Is it wort it? I se
On 14/09/2007, Pål Jensen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> What I'm wondering about is when anyone is going to manufacture a sensor
> that actually capture sharp images
Indeed, I think it's appalling that people will have to put up with
ISO3200 images of this quality:
http://chsv.nikon-image.com
What's wrong with
A.
Never mind.
Cheers,
Dave
On 9/14/07, Digital Image Studio <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On 14/09/2007, Pål Jensen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > What I'm wondering about is when anyone is going to manufacture a sensor
> > that actually capture sharp images...
Pål Jensen wrote:
> - Original Message -
> From: "Roman" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To:
> Sent: Friday, September 14, 2007 12:56 PM
> Subject: Nikon D300 sample photos
>
>
>> http://www.nikon-image.com/jpn/products/camera/slr/digital/d300/sample.
Yes, what a disaster. The guy should have shot it on Ektachrome 400 and pushed
it three stops:-).
Paul
-- Original message --
From: "Digital Image Studio" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> On 14/09/2007, Pål Jensen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > What I'm wondering about is
From:
"Digital Image Studio"
> On 14/09/2007, Pål Jensen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> What I'm wondering about is when anyone is going to manufacture a sensor
>> > that actually capture sharp images
>>
> Indeed, I think it's appalling that people will have to put up with
> ISO3200 images
On 15/09/2007, John Sessoms <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I'm guessing that's sarcasm, although I did get a crick in my neck
> trying to turn sideways to actually look at it. Gotta get me one of them
> monitors that has the swivel arm so you can rotate it for vertical shots.
Sarcasm? Indeed, at it
Digital Image Studio escribió:
> On 14/09/2007, Pål Jensen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>> What I'm wondering about is when anyone is going to manufacture a sensor
>> that actually capture sharp images
>
> Indeed, I think it's appalling that people will have to put up with
> ISO3200 images of
On 15/09/2007, Carlos Royo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> It seems an excellent ISO 3200 sample, but if you look at the face of
> the girl closely, it has the typicla "plastic" look that results from
> applying heavy noise reduction. Perhaps it has something to do with the
> CMOS image sensor.
I th
On 9/14/07, Pål Jensen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> - Original Message -
> From: "Roman" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To:
> Sent: Friday, September 14, 2007 12:56 PM
> Subject: Nikon D300 sample photos
>
>
> > http://www.nikon-image.com/jpn/
Mmm if you look at the girl's nose just next to her left eye, the
details are actually quite "grainy" (is that English?).
I don't know if it is the in-camera processing or the CMOS processing
but there's defenitely heavy noise reduction here, and sometimes
(where I hinted at) it doesn't work too w
On 9/16/07, Thibouille <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Mmm if you look at the girl's nose just next to her left eye, the
> details are actually quite "grainy" (is that English?).
>
> I don't know if it is the in-camera processing or the CMOS processing
> but there's defenitely heavy noise reduction he
Actually the image looks surprisingly film like.
David J Brooks wrote:
> On 9/16/07, Thibouille <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>> Mmm if you look at the girl's nose just next to her left eye, the
>> details are actually quite "grainy" (is that English?).
>>
>> I don't know if it is the in-camera
David J Brooks wrote:
> I still have no plans on buying any more Dslr's anyway.
Mark!
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
mike wilson wrote:
>David J Brooks wrote:
>
>> I still have no plans on buying any more Dslr's anyway.
>
>Mark!
I have no plans on putting any more quotations into the annual PDML
quote list solely for the purpose of embarrassing people.
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http:/
Mark Roberts wrote:
> mike wilson wrote:
>
>
>>David J Brooks wrote:
>>
>>
>>>I still have no plans on buying any more Dslr's anyway.
>>
>>Mark!
>
>
> I have no plans on putting any more quotations into the annual PDML
> quote list solely for the purpose of embarrassing people.
>
It's not fo
> >>
> >>
> >>>I still have no plans on buying any more Dslr's anyway.
> >>
> >>Mark!
> >
> >
> > I have no plans on putting any more quotations into the annual
PDML
> > quote list solely for the purpose of embarrassing people.
> >
>
> It's not for embarrassment, it's to demonstrate how easily
On 16/09/07, Mark Roberts, discombobulated, unleashed:
>I have no plans on putting any more quotations into the annual PDML
>quote list solely for the purpose of embarrassing people.
Mark!
--
Cheers,
Cotty
___/\__
|| (O) | People, Places, Pastiche
||=|http://www.cottysnap
>
> From: Cotty <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Date: 2007/09/16 Sun PM 11:23:14 GMT
> To: "pentax list"
> Subject: Re: Nikon D300 sample photos
>
> On 16/09/07, Mark Roberts, discombobulated, unleashed:
>
> >I have no plans on putting any more quotations
Is it something i said.:-)
Dave
On 9/17/07, mike wilson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> >
> > From: Cotty <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > Date: 2007/09/16 Sun PM 11:23:14 GMT
> > To: "pentax list"
> > Subject: Re: Nikon D300 sample photos
> &
2007/9/16, P. J. Alling <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> Actually the image looks surprisingly film like.
Mmm I have to admit I didn't look at it from that angle.
Still seems very strange to me but maybe my brain (or eyes) are
already too much used to usual digital-CCD-like grain.
Maybe I should take my KX
22 matches
Mail list logo
