Hi Cotty,
On Sun, 6 Jan 2002 23:00:18 +, Cotty wrote:
Yup. The Nikon site proclaims that there is no Nikon-originated profile
for the LS-1000. I have searched a bit further. I use Google almost
exclusively [...]
I'm afraid I can't help much, then. :-) In Evening's Photoshop for
Hi Cotty,
if you want to make the work yourself, there are very good
_freeware_ (so you don't have to have PS6)
tools for generating ICC/ICM (?) profiles from scans of a known
target. Generally, it works by scanning a known target like IT-8,
(e.g. Kodak's Q60 or the equivalent
Monday, January 07, 2002, 2:37:01 PM, Doug wrote:
[...]
DF Photographers book, he mentions that there's a company out there that
DF will build a profile for a specific output device. My suspicion is
DF that it's more expensive than a new scanner that does have an ICC
DF profile from the
- Original Message -
From: Shel Belinkoff [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Sunday, January 06, 2002 12:27 AM
Subject: OK, Now Where Do I Go? [was Re: Scanning Terminology Questions]
| Hi Paul ...
|
| That's the scanner I've used a few times. It seems to be a pretty
over here the very good printers who do Iris etc. prints also do the
scanning themselves rather than taking a customer's scan. This lets
them control the entire process and avoids discussions about whose
fault it is if the print isn't up to scratch. It means the entire
process is calibrated in
Hi Cotty,
On Sun, 6 Jan 2002 17:14:46 +, Cotty wrote:
scanning themselves rather than taking a customer's scan. [...] It
means the entire process is calibrated in the same way.
Indeed. Is this what is known as a 'closed loop' setup?
Yes, it is.
Alas, a lowly Nikon LS-1000 film
Hi Paul ...
That's the scanner I've used a few times. It seems to be a pretty
capable machine. It does 4000 ppi. One of the questions I have to
answer is am I going to make serious prints from scans? If so, then I'm
going to want a scanner that will give me the broadest range of detail
and
7 matches
Mail list logo
