Re: OT: Amusing photos

2016-03-11 Thread Bill
On 3/11/2016 2:05 PM, Igor PDML-StR wrote: Bill Thu, 10 Mar 2016 10:26:02 -0800 wrote: On 3/10/2016 12:07 PM, Paul Stenquist wrote: I must have missed the amusing ones. They are there, you just have to be 4 to appreciate them. I am 4.5 and I still appreciate some of them. ;-) Some

Re: OT: Amusing photos

2016-03-11 Thread Igor PDML-StR
Bill Thu, 10 Mar 2016 10:26:02 -0800 wrote: On 3/10/2016 12:07 PM, Paul Stenquist wrote: I must have missed the amusing ones. They are there, you just have to be 4 to appreciate them. I am 4.5 and I still appreciate some of them. ;-) Sorry guys and gals, while I am not getting some

Re: OT: Amusing photos

2016-03-10 Thread ann sanfedele
I didn't think they were all the same photographer , actually ... I like Paul's comment :-) ann On 3/10/2016 4:44 PM, John wrote: The "STUDENT DRIVER" one was funny. Almost happened to me. On 3/10/2016 1:23 PM, Larry Colen wrote: Paul Stenquist wrote: I must have missed the amusing ones.

Re: OT: Amusing photos

2016-03-10 Thread John
The "STUDENT DRIVER" one was funny. Almost happened to me. On 3/10/2016 1:23 PM, Larry Colen wrote: Paul Stenquist wrote: I must have missed the amusing ones. Perhaps you just are not juvenile enough. Paul via phone On Mar 10, 2016, at 12:48 PM, ann sanfedele

Re: OT: Amusing photos

2016-03-10 Thread John
Looks like they're all by one guy & there's a link to his web site at the bottom. On 3/10/2016 12:48 PM, ann sanfedele wrote: and quite a few that are not at all funny - just horrible, contrived, juvenille .. :-( then there is the other thing... where are the photo credits? at least the

Re: OT: Amusing photos

2016-03-10 Thread ann sanfedele
ah - I thought he had just _gathered_ them - confess to not reading the article but just dashing through the images.. ann On 3/10/2016 1:07 PM, Mark Roberts wrote: ann sanfedele wrote: and quite a few that are not at all funny - just horrible, contrived, juvenille .. :-(

Re: OT: Amusing photos

2016-03-10 Thread Bill
On 3/10/2016 12:07 PM, Paul Stenquist wrote: I must have missed the amusing ones. They are there, you just have to be 4 to appreciate them. -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link

Re: OT: Amusing photos

2016-03-10 Thread Larry Colen
Paul Stenquist wrote: I must have missed the amusing ones. Perhaps you just are not juvenile enough. Paul via phone On Mar 10, 2016, at 12:48 PM, ann sanfedele wrote: and quite a few that are not at all funny - just horrible, contrived, juvenille .. :-( then there

Re: OT: Amusing photos

2016-03-10 Thread Paul Stenquist
I must have missed the amusing ones. Paul via phone > On Mar 10, 2016, at 12:48 PM, ann sanfedele wrote: > > and quite a few that are not at all funny - just horrible, contrived, > juvenille .. :-( > > then there is the other thing... where are the photo credits? > > at

Re: OT: Amusing photos

2016-03-10 Thread Mark Roberts
ann sanfedele wrote: >and quite a few that are not at all funny - just horrible, contrived, >juvenille .. :-( > >then there is the other thing... where are the photo credits? The article itself provides the credit: They're the work of "Los Angeles-based photographer David

Re: OT: Amusing photos

2016-03-10 Thread ann sanfedele
and quite a few that are not at all funny - just horrible, contrived, juvenille .. :-( then there is the other thing... where are the photo credits? at least the collector didn't caption them.. phew.. ann On 3/10/2016 3:58 AM, Larry Colen wrote: Quite a few amusing photos:

OT: Amusing photos

2016-03-10 Thread Larry Colen
Quite a few amusing photos: http://petapixel.com/2016/03/09/20-concept-photos-will-put-smile-face/ -- Larry Colen l...@red4est.com (postbox on min4est) http://red4est.com/lrc -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from the