A simple thing to do would be to run EXIFTool on both the original
image files and the ones that had been opened by Photoshop, see what
had changed.
I am sure that Photoshop wouldn't change the actual JPEG data but
some change to the metadata isn't hard to imagine.
Godfrey
2008/2/9, Derby
I don't know if it matters if this is Mac or PC, but I think just
opening it Photoshop makes a thumnail icon or a "Photoshop" jpg icon
that "goes with" the file rather than the generic jpg icon it had ...
even without saving it, that might be enough for the camera not to
like it.
Maybe som
I believe the file system change the "last opened date" in the file
allocation table each time a file is opened. Maybe the camera doesn't
like discrepancy between "last opened" and "last saved", I dunno...
Jostein
2008/2/9, Derby Chang <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> Sort of OT, but this puzzles me.
>
> M
There are several variations on the Jpeg standard. The camera probably
only recognizes it's own output. In fact the only difference is
probably in the OS tags and just opening it may have modified some of
the tags to something that the camera doesn't recognize so it doesn't
even attempt to op
Sort of OT, but this puzzles me.
My friend as a little Canon P&S. She recently took a few pics that she
wanted to print straight away. So she pulled the card out, opened a few
of the pics from the card (knowing she shouldn't do this, but she was in
a rush) in Photoshop, and printed them. Didn't
5 matches
Mail list logo
