Re: OT: Digital Lith (was Re: "Fake" vs "Real" effects)

2004-12-10 Thread Patrick Genovese
Hi Mark, Those are some very images you've got there. & itnteresting technique. Thans for posting the URL... Its on my bookmark list now. Rgds Patrick All, Well, here they are. These are architectural shots taken of a community center a couple of blocks from my house in East Sacramento. I'm go

Re: OT: Digital Lith (was Re: "Fake" vs "Real" effects)

2004-12-09 Thread Mark Erickson
Rob, Nice work with your images. I really like this technique because it gives the user fairly independent control over the shadows and highlights. You can also change the image dramatically by using the channel mixer to convert to convert your image to monochrome. Because of differences in l

Re: OT: Digital Lith (was Re: "Fake" vs "Real" effects)

2004-12-09 Thread Rob Studdert
On 8 Dec 2004 at 21:06, Mark Erickson wrote: > http://www.pauck.de/marco/photo/lith/digital_lith/digital_lith.html > > I'm actually getting very nice prints on my Epson R800 printer. Compared to > the > prints, the web images maintain some of the feel but lose a lot of the fine > crispness that

Re: OT: Digital Lith (was Re: "Fake" vs "Real" effects)

2004-12-09 Thread Paul Stenquist
Great images. I bookmarked that Marco Pauck page for future reference. Sounds like fun. Paul On Dec 9, 2004, at 12:06 AM, Mark Erickson wrote: All, Well, here they are. These are architectural shots taken of a community center a couple of blocks from my house in East Sacramento. I'm going for

OT: Digital Lith (was Re: "Fake" vs "Real" effects)

2004-12-08 Thread Mark Erickson
All, Well, here they are. These are architectural shots taken of a community center a couple of blocks from my house in East Sacramento. I'm going for an edgy, empty, wintery feel with these: http://www.westerickson.net/mark/misc/ClunieDoor1.jpg http://www.westerickson.net/mark/misc/ClunieDoor