Has anybody tried the newer Fuji True Definition film? Opinions? Is it
just a Superia rehash?
Thanks in advance.
Robert
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
My heart weeps.
No, film is not OT.
Sincerely,
Collin Brendemuehl
http://www.brendemuehl.net
"He is no fool who gives what he cannot keep to gain what he cannot lose"
-- Jim Elliott
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.n
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Peifer, William
> [OCDUS]
>
> Hi Mark,
>
> Hmmm, interesting idea! I'm not aware of any efforts in
> that direction.
> >From what I've heard, the big threat to X-ray film profits
> is the conversion
>
Bill Peifer wrote:
>
>Mark Roberts wrote:
>> Anyone know if they're making chromogenic x-ray film? It would seem
>> to be a natural cost-saver in terms of silver recycling.
>> Why do I suspect that Bill Peifer will have information on this? ;-)
>
>Hmmm, interesting idea! I'm not aware of any effo
Mark Roberts wrote:
> I never thought
> about the possibility of digital imaging for x-rays. Now that is interesting.
> No more pinning those broken bones, just fix 'em with Photoshop!
I suspect it is the wave of the future.
About two years ago I had a root canal and the dentist had a digital
Hi,
Chromogenic films use silver just as well...
But in the final processing steps, it's bleached and activises the
dyes (probably there is less silver than in traditional BW films
though)
I think the digital Xray is much more promising for them.
Fra
-
This message is from th
Hi,
Chaso DeChaso wrote:
Does anyone have any opinions on Konica Chrome R-100
color slide film?
I've been using a lot of the 200ASA SRM. Accurate exposure but rather a
cool appearance. Might be because it's outdated8-)
By the way, I use Konica Centuria print film lately -
a local supermar
Mike wrote:
I have some similar 800ASA (for Cath's Espio 140 [f10!!]) which I cannot
get to expose properly. It always turns out muddy, even when I've tried
it in another machine with a bit of overexposure.
Is it a house brand? A lot of them use Ferenia (3M) which I don't think is
as good as th
- Original Message -
From: "Butch Black"
Subject: Re: OT: film question (Konica Chrome R-100)
If it lists multiple chemistries (almost all will list
> C-41) the first listed, or first after C-41 can give a hint. AP-70
is Agfa,
> CN-16 is Konica or Fuji, usually Konica
Hi,
Butch Black wrote:
Mike wrote:
I have some similar 800ASA (for Cath's Espio 140 [f10!!]) which I cannot
get to expose properly. It always turns out muddy, even when I've tried
it in another machine with a bit of overexposure.
Is it a house brand? A lot of them use Ferenia (3M) which I don't th
Bill wrote:
A lot of the newer machine don't give film type information.
The ones I run read the DX code off the film edge and check to see if
there is a bias for that film in memory, and applies that bias.
Otherwise, they just print the film.
They do a surprisingly good job at it too. I was quite
B&H lists two different types of film for most of the brand/specification.
One is marked "USA" and another "Imported." The price difference is
quite a lot, especially for print films. Are the imported films
markedly more inferior to the ones made in the USA? Or it doesn't
really matter and would
wal
> Subject: OT film question: difference between USA and Imported
> Date: Tue, 14 May 2002 02:55:07 -0700
>
> B&H lists two different types of film for most of the
> brand/specification.
> One is marked "USA" and another "Imported." The price difference
quality.
Ciao,
Graywolf
http://pages.prodigy.net/graywolfphoto
- Original Message -
From: Gaurav Aggarwal <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Tuesday, May 14, 2002 6:09 AM
Subject: OT film question
14 matches
Mail list logo
