- Original Message -
From: "David Chang-Sang" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Sunday, June 09, 2002 3:40 PM
Subject: RE: My reasons for wanting digital (was: Re: OT: Read this before
you spend all your $$$)
> Next TOPDML Jeff :)
Yea, we ha
stuff
now.
Jim A.
> From: Bruce Dayton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Date: Sun, 9 Jun 2002 13:44:44 -0700
> To: William Robb <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Subject: Re[2]: My reasons for wanting digital (was: Re: OT: Read this before
> you spend all
William,
The one thing that you can tell from the little screen is if you
totally blew the shot. Not that helpful for an experienced
photographer. I'm finding that lately I'm using my Coolpix 990 less
and less. It was very fun for awhile and then it kind of wore off.
Neither my wife or I use i
ct: RE: My reasons for wanting digital (was: Re: OT: Read this before
you spend all your $$$)
> $400 CDN is a steal for a good condition G1
>
> I've got one, it's about a year and 7 months old. Purchased it new for
> $1100 CDN plus taxes.
> Once you "get the han
was: Re: OT: Read this before
you spend all your $$$)
> - Original Message -
> From: Jeff
> Subject: Re: My reasons for wanting digital
>
> > My daughter works at Canada's Wonderland as a "photographer".
> > For the second year in a row the regula
nting digital (was: Re: OT: Read this before
you spend all your $$$)
> $400 CDN is a steal for a good condition G1
>
> I've got one, it's about a year and 7 months old. Purchased it new for
> $1100 CDN plus taxes.
> Once you "get the hang of it" (learning
- Original Message -
From: "William Robb" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Sunday, June 09, 2002 2:05 PM
Subject: Re: My reasons for wanting digital (was: Re: OT: Read this before
you spend all your $$$)
> - Original Message -
>
]On Behalf Of William Robb
Sent: Sunday, June 09, 2002 2:06 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: My reasons for wanting digital (was: Re: OT: Read this
before you spend all your $$$)
- Original Message -
From: Jeff
Subject: Re: My reasons for wanting digital
> My daughter works at
- Original Message -
From: Jeff
Subject: Re: My reasons for wanting digital
> My daughter works at Canada's Wonderland as a "photographer".
> For the second year in a row the regulation camera is the G1.
> People are paying a minimum of $15 CDN for prints coming out
of these
> cameras. I'
CTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Sunday, June 09, 2002 1:05 PM
Subject: Re: My reasons for wanting digital (was: Re: OT: Read this before
you spend all your $$$)
> - Original Message -
> From: Herb Chong
> Subject: Re: My reasons for wanting digital (was: Re: OT: Rea
- Original Message -
From: Herb Chong
Subject: Re: My reasons for wanting digital (was: Re: OT: Read
this before you spend all your $$$)
>
> yes. a Canon G1 or G2 made a conscious effort to mimic their
35mm P&S
> line's controls. it makes a big difference.
I am
- Original Message -
From: "Paul F. Stregevsky" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Sunday, June 09, 2002 7:59 AM
Subject: Re: My reasons for wanting digital (was: Re: OT: Read this before
you spend all your $$$)
> Cotty,
>
> I thoroughly
I'm with you Paul. I can sit down in my "fully lighted office" the sun
shining, the birds singing. Put on a little Springsteen, or whatever strikes
my fancy, sit back and create. I get better quality prints with my Epson than
I ever get from photo labs even mant custom labs, cheaper, faster and
Cotty,
I thoroughly enjoyed your insights into the value of digital for
photographers who lack the time to spend scanning et al. I related to it
because I spend too much time color-correcting my tungsten-cast shots.
But if digital is so convenient, why, then, am I nearly always the only
photo
Tonghang Zhou wrote:
"I see the real advantage of digital camera being the instant-feedback and
shoot as many as you want to experiment capability. You can't do this with
film. An acquaintance once mentioned this: with his new digital camera, he
shoots a lot of pictures, way more than he otherw
I spend many enjoyable hours in the digital darkroom using PhotoShop,
and I don't own a digital camera. Scanning film provides another layer
to the process. I can look at my machine prints, then scan the negative
with my ultimate goal in mind. Then, it's on to PhotoShop. I wouldn't
want to start w
Hi Bob,
Your post was very interesting and I thought I would take some time and
address the issues you raise...
><< http://www.luminous-landscape.com/parable.htm >>
>If you read the above (1 page note) and Cotty's recent reference to a
>luminous-landscape article (longer) comparing the Canon
TECTED]]
> Sent: 08 June 2002 13:39
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: OT: Read this before you spend all your $$$
>
>
> << http://www.luminous-landscape.com/parable.htm >>
>
> If you read the above (1 page note) and Cotty's recent reference to a
On Sat, 8 Jun 2002, Steve Desjardins wrote:
> be inexpensive and allow you to only print what you want. The best part
> of digital is not the camera but the ability to use Photoshop, since it
> gives many of us a new capability, i.e., the ability to correct our own
> color images.
>
> Just my two
http://www.luminous-landscape.com/parable.htm
Send and receive Hotmail on your mobile device: Click Here
-
This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List. To unsubscribe,
go to http://www.pdml.net and follow the direct
20 matches
Mail list logo
