Here's the point since you haven't got it: Someone prepared to teach
students something which flies in the face of indisputable evidence has
to be absolutely crazy, or the story itself is bullshit. Take your pick.
There are plenty of explanations you can try. I can think of at least
two other
On Jul 25, 2006, at 7:22 AM, Don Williams wrote:
Here's the point since you haven't got it: Someone prepared to teach
students something which flies in the face of indisputable evidence has
to be absolutely crazy, or the story itself is bullshit.
While I agree that the concept is repugnant,
2 matches
Mail list logo
