Bill,I still have my "slide" from college if
you need it :)
Dave
Begin Original Message
From: "[EMAIL PROTECTED]" http://mail2web.com/ .
-
This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail
List. To unsubscribe,
go to http://www.pdml.net and follow the
directions. Don't forget to
visit t
I can speak to this. I just upgraded my older home PC from Windows NT
4.0 to Windows 2000 Professional. According to Microsoft's published
requirements, my old hardware-a 230 MHz AMD chip with 160 MB of
RAM--could just get by.
I wiped my old OS clean and installed Windows 2000.
Well, the PC wou
for Norton Utilities 3.x)
In a nutshell, a "nice" MS-DOS stuff, that doesn't ask for hardware or
"nonstandard" things like EMS and XMS (which is also hardware) will
work. Everything else -- won't.
Best,
Mishka.
> From: Fred
> Subject: Re: OT: Windows 20
Can't answer all your questions but 2kPro was pretty slow on my P2-266 with
PC66-320MB RAM and DMA33 hard drive. Some hardwares were not supported or
not running at all even they claimed they should (parallel scanner, printer
and Zip100). I just went back to 89SE on that machine. However, 2k is
"Peifer, William [OCDUS]" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>Hi folks,
>
>Sorry for the OT note,
Or IT note, as the case may be ;-)
>Just got a note from the powers that be here at work asking if any of us are
>likely to have "issues" with a planned upgrade from Win 95 to Win 2k.
I got upgraded fro
W2k has been the standard Windows OS at my company for quite some time. It is, to a
great degree, 98 with a NT kernel. Looks and works like Windows 9.x, but is much more
crash resistant. You won't have any trouble running old apps so long as you have
enough memory: 128MB min.
-
This message is
Hi folks,
Thanks again to all for your many helpful comments on my Win2k questions.
Very good to know your experiences with this.
Regarding DOS, I think I'm on the same side of the fence as Fred. I've got
a few ancient, but still useful, DOS routines that I use once in a while.
The old QuickBAS
7 matches
Mail list logo
