Ryan Brooks wrote:
>
> DagT wrote:
> > No, the photographer used DOF correctly to lead our attention to the
> > person in the background.
> >
> > DagT
> >
> Ditto here. The story was the CIA guy, not the President. Excellent
> timing on the shot too- sums things up well.
>
> -Ryan
Ditto ditto
Igor,
The photographer did the job in a very typical way and it's perfectly
successful. The editor who wrote the caption likely didn't even know
who the photographer was.
Godfrey
On May 7, 2006, at 2:03 PM, Igor Roshchin wrote:
... If indeed, the photographer's intention was to draw atte
Good point. You should be a writer, says Paul (Who is a writer 90% of
the time.)
On May 7, 2006, at 5:07 PM, Aaron Reynolds wrote:
ood
On May 7, 2006, at 5:03 PM, Igor Roshchin wrote:
2. The caption says:
"President Bush (R) announces the resignation of CIA Director Porter
Goss (L)
.. "
So
On May 7, 2006, at 5:03 PM, Igor Roshchin wrote:
2. The caption says:
"President Bush (R) announces the resignation of CIA Director Porter
Goss (L)
.. "
So, I expect at least the subject (as opposed to just the object) of
the caption sentence being in focus.
If indeed, the photographer's inte
First, I guess the photographer used a long lens, because if he would
have used wide angle, he must have been on the President's lap. This
already reduces DOF-range.
Second, he's using available light (which definitely is better for
portraits or even any photography), so probably large apertur
On May 7, 2006, at 4:46 PM, Cotty wrote:
I think the photographer wanted to direct attention to the man on the
left of frame, leaving enough detail with the man on the right to be
identified. It's a fairly common way of guiding attention in a shot.
I don't think it's a case of you being too cr
Sun, 07 May 2006 13:31:26 -0700
Ryan Brooks wrote:
> DagT wrote:
> > No, the photographer used DOF correctly to lead our attention to the
> > person in the background.
> >
> > DagT
>
> Ditto here. The story was the CIA guy, not the President. Excellent
> timing on the shot too- sums things up
On 7/5/06, Igor Roshchin, discombobulated, unleashed:
>Reading some news on Reuters web-site, I saw this photo:
>http://today.reuters.com/news/newsPhotoPresentation.aspx?
>type=topNews&imageID=2006-05-07T163934Z_01_N05403243_RTRUKOP_0_PICTURE0.xml
>http://tinyurl.com/l98u6
>
>(from this new articl
DagT wrote:
No, the photographer used DOF correctly to lead our attention to the
person in the background.
DagT
Ditto here. The story was the CIA guy, not the President. Excellent
timing on the shot too- sums things up well.
-Ryan
Den 7. mai. 2006 kl. 19.47 skrev Igor Roshchin:
Readi
No, the photographer used DOF correctly to lead our attention to the
person in the background.
DagT
Den 7. mai. 2006 kl. 19.47 skrev Igor Roshchin:
Reading some news on Reuters web-site, I saw this photo:
http://today.reuters.com/news/newsPhotoPresentation.aspx?
type=topNews&imageID=2006-0
Reading some news on Reuters web-site, I saw this photo:
http://today.reuters.com/news/newsPhotoPresentation.aspx?type=topNews&imageID=2006-05-07T163934Z_01_N05403243_RTRUKOP_0_PICTURE0.xml
http://tinyurl.com/l98u6
(from this new article
http://today.reuters.com/news/newsarticle.aspx?type=topNews
11 matches
Mail list logo
