is true,
there would be no need for proof sheets and editing, and the 'professionals'
are the ones who make the most use of them.
Tom C.
From: graywolf [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List pdml@pdml.net
To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List pdml@pdml.net
Subject: Re: OT - Taking Your
: OT - Taking Your Photography To The Next Level.
Agreed. I found George's rankings mildly interesting, but not
particularly valuable. They're more descriptive than prescriptive.
Paul
On Jan 25, 2007, at 6:51 PM, Digital Image Studio wrote:
On 26/01/07, Kenneth Waller [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote
Cut the guy some slack - this is, after all, just part one of
a three-part article. The prescriptive stuff comes later,
as alluded to in the final part of this initial article.
Sure, it's nothing earth-shattering. But it's a reasonable
set of definitions, laying the groundwork for later
On 1/25/07, Kenneth Waller [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Interesting reading, well written, that most of us could benefit from.
http://www.luminous-landscape.com/essays/next-level.shtml
Thanks for the link, Ken. I followed the link at the bottom of the
article to his personal website, where I also
for proof sheets and editing, and the 'professionals'
are the ones who make the most use of them.
Tom C.
From: graywolf [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List pdml@pdml.net
To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List pdml@pdml.net
Subject: Re: OT - Taking Your Photography To The Next
incompetent.
Tom C.
From: graywolf [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List pdml@pdml.net
To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List pdml@pdml.net
Subject: Re: OT - Taking Your Photography To The Next Level.
Date: Fri, 26 Jan 2007 17:13:55 -0500
You miss my point, Tom. The proof sheet
and competent) as a
photo.
--
Bob
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of graywolf
Sent: 26 January 2007 22:14
To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List
Subject: Re: OT - Taking Your Photography To The Next Level.
You miss my point, Tom. The proof
(although entirely professional and competent) as a
photo.
--
Bob
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of graywolf
Sent: 26 January 2007 22:14
To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List
Subject: Re: OT - Taking Your Photography To The Next Level.
You miss my
Interesting reading, well written, that most of us could benefit from.
http://www.luminous-landscape.com/essays/next-level.shtml
Kenneth Waller
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
On Thu, Jan 25, 2007 at 04:35:59PM -0500, Kenneth Waller wrote:
Interesting reading, well written, that most of us could benefit from.
http://www.luminous-landscape.com/essays/next-level.shtml
Kenneth Waller
Interesting, indeed.
So getting a 4F rating would be seen as a good thing?
--
On 26/01/07, Kenneth Waller [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Interesting reading, well written, that most of us could benefit from.
http://www.luminous-landscape.com/essays/next-level.shtml
Personally I think George should stick to being a physician and give
up on the self appointed post of sage
Agreed. I found George's rankings mildly interesting, but not
particularly valuable. They're more descriptive than prescriptive.
Paul
On Jan 25, 2007, at 6:51 PM, Digital Image Studio wrote:
On 26/01/07, Kenneth Waller [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Interesting reading, well written, that most of
On 26/01/07, Adam Maas [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
He did a much better job than Ken Rockwell's version of the skill rating
scale.
LOL, are you surprised (I say with a fake bronzed smile)!
--
Rob Studdert
HURSTVILLE AUSTRALIA
Tel +61-2-9554-4110
UTC(GMT) +10 Hours
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Digital Image Studio wrote:
On 26/01/07, Kenneth Waller [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Interesting reading, well written, that most of us could benefit from.
http://www.luminous-landscape.com/essays/next-level.shtml
Personally I think George should stick to being a physician and give
up on the
LOL, are you surprised (I say with a fake bronzed smile)!
--
Rob Studdert
Do your eyes also always look like they are going to bug out of their
sockets?
Tom C.
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
John Francis wrote:
So getting a 4F rating would be seen as a good thing?
Hell, yes. Going to war is a bitch! ;-)
--
Thanks,
DougF (KG4LMZ)
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
or a liar.
Tom C.
From: Paul Stenquist [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List pdml@pdml.net
To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List pdml@pdml.net
Subject: Re: OT - Taking Your Photography To The Next Level.
Date: Thu, 25 Jan 2007 19:07:46 -0500
Agreed. I found George's rankings mildly interesting
My stuff is all good.
Dave (the liar)
On 1/26/07, Tom C [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Show me a photographer that thinks every shot they take is great and I'll
show you someone who is either undiscriminating or a liar.
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
As long as we understand that the top photographers toss-outs are better
than our best, that is true.
It really bothers me that folks think great photographs are a product of
averages, of luck. A competent photographer does not produce many duds
(as long as he is working at it, if he is old
19 matches
Mail list logo
