Saturday, December 25, 2004 11:50 AM
Subject: Re: OT Fitting your CCD to a format, interesting tech
> and a Camera body twice the size from Nikon or Canon...
;Paul Stenquist" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To:
Sent: Friday, December 24, 2004 10:07 PM
Subject: Re: OT Fitting your CCD to a format, interesting tech
Perhaps you should shoot with an Optio?
--
I can understand why mankind hasn't given up war.
During a war you get to drive tanks
4, 2004 10:07 PM
Subject: Re: OT Fitting your CCD to a format, interesting tech
> Perhaps you should shoot with an Optio?
004 5:41 PM
Subject: Re: OT Fitting your CCD to a format, interesting tech
The *istD is too large? I couldn't imagine using it without the
battery
grip. it's the smallest SLR digital in the world. No offense, but how
big
are your hands?
that's irrelevant. i have to carry it where the *ist film camera is marginal
in size and weight.
Herb
- Original Message -
From: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To:
Sent: Friday, December 24, 2004 5:41 PM
Subject: Re: OT Fitting your CCD to a format, interesting tech
> The *ist
Height, I think not. Width, yes. Depth, it's deeper...
Shel Belinkoff wrote:
Isn't the istds smaller?
Shel
[Original Message]
From: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To:
Date: 12/24/2004 2:42:53 PM
Subject: Re: OT Fitting your CCD to a format, interesting tech
The *istD is too large? I
Height, I think not. Width, yes. Depth, it's deaper...
Shel Belinkoff wrote:
Isn't the istds smaller?
Shel
[Original Message]
From: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To:
Date: 12/24/2004 2:42:53 PM
Subject: Re: OT Fitting your CCD to a format, interesting tech
The *istD is too large? I
Isn't the istds smaller?
Shel
> [Original Message]
> From: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To:
> Date: 12/24/2004 2:42:53 PM
> Subject: Re: OT Fitting your CCD to a format, interesting tech
>
> The *istD is too large? I couldn't imagine using it without the batter
Message -
> From: "Rob Studdert" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To:
> Sent: Friday, December 24, 2004 6:01 PM
> Subject: Re: OT Fitting your CCD to a format, interesting tech
>
>
> > On 22 Dec 2004 at 6:36, Herb Chong wrote:
> >
> > > a centimeter
it adds thickness to the camera and i think the *istD is already too large.
Herb...
- Original Message -
From: "Rob Studdert" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To:
Sent: Friday, December 24, 2004 6:01 PM
Subject: Re: OT Fitting your CCD to a format, interesting tech
> On 22 Dec
On 22 Dec 2004 at 6:36, Herb Chong wrote:
> a centimeter is much larger than you think. even a couple of millimeters is a
> lot. if you want to use your old lenses, you have a fixed distance in front of
> the sensor that will only grow by adding a light pipe.
The light-pipe appears optically to h
Subject: Re: OT Fitting your CCD to a format, interesting tech
- Original Message -
From: "Raimo K" Subject: Re: OT Fitting your CCD to a format, interesting
tech
Like larger size films are more sensitive?
Raimo, are you serious?
William Robb
- Original Message -
From: "Raimo K"
Subject: Re: OT Fitting your CCD to a format, interesting tech
Like larger size films are more sensitive?
Raimo, are you serious?
William Robb
ive?
All the best!
Raimo K
Personal photography homepage at:
http://www.uusikaupunki.fi/~raikorho
- Original Message - From: "Rob Studdert" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To:
Sent: Wednesday, December 22, 2004 12:30 AM
Subject: Re: OT Fitting your CCD to a format, interesting tech
Wh
Like larger size films are more sensitive?
All the best!
Raimo K
Personal photography homepage at:
http://www.uusikaupunki.fi/~raikorho
- Original Message -
From: "Rob Studdert" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To:
Sent: Wednesday, December 22, 2004 12:30 AM
Subject: Re: OT Fitti
ubject: RE: OT Fitting your CCD to a format, interesting tech
> Herb, Herb, Herb,
>
> AFAIK this is still a concept. I can't tell if the illustrations are
photos
> of prototypes or if they are CGI. If it ever does get implemented it'll
be
> a long time before custo
On 22/12/04, Rob Studdert, discombobulated, unleashed:
>As long as the spatial resolution is higher than the Nyquist frequency
of the
>sensor it shouldn't be a problem, in fact if it were specially designed it
>could effectively replace the birefringent filter.
He's been at the Tooheys again.
Herb, Herb, Herb,
AFAIK this is still a concept. I can't tell if the illustrations are photos
of prototypes or if they are CGI. If it ever does get implemented it'll be
a long time before customers hold cameras, so I wouldn't fret about the
technicalities just yet.
But remember that most 35mm S
On 21 Dec 2004 at 22:46, Herb Chong wrote:
> the fibers would have to be such that there isn't any gaps over pixels.
> also, would force the back to be much thicker. i for one won't go for it.
As long as the spatial resolution is higher than the Nyquist frequency of the
sensor it shouldn't be a
esday, December 21, 2004 9:57 AM
Subject: RE: OT Fitting your CCD to a format, interesting tech
> Indeed, using the Fused Fibre Optic components an 8MP 1.6x APS sensor
could be
> transformed to cover the area of a 24x36mm frame and effectively increase
its
> ISO. It's a pity is not likely
On 21 Dec 2004 at 16:25, Steve Jolly wrote:
> Frantisek wrote:
> > I am sorry I don't understand why the ISO would increase? Am I just
> > tired today (i.e. dumb) ?
>
> You're capturing light from a larger area, so more light hits the
> sensor, so you can use a lower ISO setting.
>
> I'm not s
Actually HP already has software for intelligently stitching picture
segments together. It might be feasible.
Anthony Farr wrote:
Judging by the picture, it also seems that large arrays of small CCDs might
be assembled with minimal or no interruption at the boundaries between
chips. If it's eco
Frantisek wrote:
I am sorry I don't understand why the ISO would increase? Am I just
tired today (i.e. dumb) ?
You're capturing light from a larger area, so more light hits the
sensor, so you can use a lower ISO setting.
I'm not sure I'd have chosen to describe this as "effectively increasing
t
Tuesday, December 21, 2004, 3:57:36 PM, Rob wrote:
RS> On 22 Dec 2004 at 0:34, Anthony Farr wrote:
>> Unless the cost of big chips can be reigned in the Schott solution,
>> implemented as I speculate, could have better economy
RS> Indeed, using the Fused Fibre Optic components an 8MP 1.6x APS s
On 22 Dec 2004 at 0:34, Anthony Farr wrote:
> Unless the cost of big chips can be reigned in the Schott solution,
> implemented as I speculate, could have better economy
Indeed, using the Fused Fibre Optic components an 8MP 1.6x APS sensor could be
transformed to cover the area of a 24x36mm fra
> -Original Message-
> From: Jon Glass [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
(snip)
> . But this is fascinating
> information. :-) Thanks.
>
I should point out that it's my speculation, not information from any
source. It's my amalgam of two existing concepts.
One concept is that more than o
On Dec 21, 2004, at 9:53 AM, Anthony Farr wrote:
" large arrays of small CCDs might be assembled with minimal or no
interruption at the boundaries between chips. If it's economical to
implement, this concept could bypass the low yield problems that make
big
CCDs cost so much more than several
>From my previous post to this thread,
" large arrays of small CCDs might be assembled with minimal or no
interruption at the boundaries between chips. If it's economical to
implement, this concept could bypass the low yield problems that make big
CCDs cost so much more than several small CCDs
Interesting, but could such a thing be used to eliminate the "reduced
frame" size of the average dSLR?
On Dec 21, 2004, at 4:29 AM, Rob Studdert wrote:
Similar to the bundled fibre concept which allowed the implementation
of NPC
Polaroid backs however with a twist, or a squeeze I should say :-)
Judging by the picture, it also seems that large arrays of small CCDs might
be assembled with minimal or no interruption at the boundaries between
chips. If it's economical to implement, this concept could bypass the low
yield problems that make big CCDs cost so much more than several small CCDs
o
Similar to the bundled fibre concept which allowed the implementation of NPC
Polaroid backs however with a twist, or a squeeze I should say :-)
http://www.schott.com/fiberoptics/english/products/ccd.html
Cheers,
Rob Studdert
HURSTVILLE AUSTRALIA
Tel +61-2-9554-4110
UTC(GMT) +10 Hours
[EMAIL P
31 matches
Mail list logo
