- Original Message -
From: Rob Brigham [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, May 28, 2003 9:07 AM
Subject: RE: Opinions wanted: Sigma 24/2.8 super wide II
I would second this. I researched this lens because I was
seriously
considering it second hand. The build
: Re: Opinions wanted: Sigma 24/2.8 super wide II
I had the manual focus version and imho, it was fine
optically. Colour
contrast were good. Flare control built quality were
lacking. The hood did
nothing to the flare problem. Regular polarizer worked fine without
vignetting. However
Hi!
I think you've convinced me. I am passing this one on. Unless of
course just a few shots I've made with it come out astoundingly good.
Then I will have to reconsider. But being able to see the distortion
in the viewfinder of my ME Super makes me think that above possibility
is rather remote.
Hi!
I am given the opportunity to buy this lens for about $100 (in local
currency g).
It goes as follows:
1. I'd get circular polarizer and UV filter and also a hood for this
lens.
2. The lens is K-mount with AF that works very find with MZ-5n that I
could handle yesterday.
Unfortunately the
Subject: Opinions wanted: Sigma 24/2.8 super wide II
Hi!
I am given the opportunity to buy this lens for about $100 (in local
currency g).
It goes as follows:
1. I'd get circular polarizer and UV filter and also a hood for this
lens.
2. The lens is K-mount with AF that works very find
5 matches
Mail list logo
