Hi all,
This one hasn't come up quite as well as I'd hoped, but here it is
anyway. I liked the texture in the sand but the shell has blown out.
http://www.bluemoon.net.nz/photo/printsdb/view.php?print_id=100t=PAW
BTW I want to formally retract all those times I've said that
Photoshop CS
In a message dated 8/28/2005 2:44:22 AM Pacific Standard Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
This one hasn't come up quite as well as I'd hoped, but here it is
anyway. I liked the texture in the sand but the shell has blown out.
http://www.bluemoon.net.nz/photo/printsdb/view.php?print_id=100t=PAW
Hello David,
Very strking shot. The contrasts are wonderful. I just wish there
was a little more DOF in the background to really make the shot
outstanding.
--
Best regards,
Bruce
Sunday, August 28, 2005, 2:41:40 AM, you wrote:
DM Hi all,
DM This one hasn't come up quite as well as I'd
It's a very nice composition, but you're right, the shell is too blown out.
Christian
- Original Message -
From: David Mann [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: pentax-discuss@pdml.net
Sent: Sunday, August 28, 2005 5:41 AM
Subject: PAW - Shell
Hi all,
This one hasn't come up quite as well as I'd
On Aug 28, 2005, at 2:41 AM, David Mann wrote:
This one hasn't come up quite as well as I'd hoped, but here it is
anyway. I liked the texture in the sand but the shell has blown out.
http://www.bluemoon.net.nz/photo/printsdb/view.php?print_id=100t=PAW
Nice work, despite the burn on the
Photoner uploads must be stripped of EXIF data. Save for Web does
this quickly and efficiently while allowing various levels of
compression. For those of us who use Photonet, it's a useful tool.
Paul
On Aug 28, 2005, at 2:44 PM, Godfrey DiGiorgi wrote:
On Aug 28, 2005, at 2:41 AM, David Mann
On 8/28/05, Bruce Dayton [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hello David,
Very strking shot. The contrasts are wonderful. I just wish there
was a little more DOF in the background to really make the shot
outstanding.
I looked at the pic, then scrolled down to see if anyone else would
have liked more
On Aug 29, 2005, at 6:44 AM, Godfrey DiGiorgi wrote:
I don't really understand using the Save for Web application.
Seems to me to add a lot of needless complication.
I found that it gives me much smaller jpg files for a given quality,
while also allowing me to pick the optimal size/quality
On Jul 3, 2004, at 4:43 PM, Boris Liberman wrote:
Dave, this is fantastic. I am very square at times g so I'd like to
point out that three bright specks on the right above and on the side
of the shell could be edited out.
Yes I noticed those and got rid of them before doing a print. I also
Hi!
DM This week's image is from the beach.
DM http://www.digistar.com/~dmann/cgi-bin/paw.cgi?date=22-May-2004
Dave, this is fantastic. I am very square at times g so I'd like to
point out that three bright specks on the right above and on the side
of the shell could be edited out.
Otherwise,
PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: PAW: Shell
Date: Sat, 22 May 2004 22:00:31 +1200
Hi all,
This week's image is from the beach.
http://www.digistar.com/~dmann/cgi-bin/paw.cgi?date=22-May-2004
Cheers,
- Dave
http://www.digistar.com/~dmann
Hi all,
This week's image is from the beach.
http://www.digistar.com/~dmann/cgi-bin/paw.cgi?date=22-May-2004
Cheers,
- Dave
http://www.digistar.com/~dmann/
Wow! This could well be the coolest shot of a shell I have ever seen.
The lighting is superb and the composition...how it is partially
buried, the V shape of the sand/shell line. This is a Best of Pug
caliber shot. One to be very proud of.
--
Best regards,
Bruce
Saturday, May 22, 2004,
I Like it. I would like to see a version in a 4x5 aspect ratio cropper to
format from the right hand side.
Butch
Each man had only one genuine vocation - to find the way to himself.
Hermann Hesse (Demian)
14 matches
Mail list logo
