ather empty landscape. To my mind, it is. But that's a
subjective call.
Paul
From: "Amita Guha" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: PAW: beach log
Date: Fri, 19 Mar 2004 22:13:14 -0500
Here's mine for the week, taken in CT
Hi!
DM> I think the whole bottom left quarter is a bit empty but overall I'm
DM> quite fond of it. It came out quite nicely on paper.
I must say that the person on the shore completes the image and makes
it rather full in my eyes...
DM> I thought about using this for my next PAW but I've alread
On Mar 24, 2004, at 09:47, Amita Guha wrote:
Anyway, no offense taken...I post shots here to get honest feedback on
them. :)
Your photo reminded me of one I took a couple of years ago.
http://www.digistar.com/~dmann/temp/beach-600.jpg
I think the whole bottom left quarter is a bit empty but over
> Amita, may I say that the previous pictures of yours that I
> commented on, on list or off list were stronger...
>
> You see, the log is in a sense piece of rubbish on the beach.
> It shouldn't be there, really. As such it stands out of the
> crowd of little rocks and other background pieces
ears it is true." -J. Robert Oppenheimer
From: "Amita Guha" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: RE: PAW: beach log
Date: Sat, 20 Mar 2004 08:38:23 -0500
Thanks for being honest, Frank. I appreciate it. :) The DOF looks
sligh
M
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: RE: PAW: beach log
>
>
> I must be honest, Amita; this one doesn't do much for me.
>
> I think there's too much brown in it. Brown log, brown sand
> - it just seems
> very dull.
>
> And, as Bill said, it either nee
Here's mine for the week, taken in CT last weekend.
http://www.sunny16.net/photos/paw/2004-03-21.html
Thoughts are appreciated.
Amita
7 matches
Mail list logo
