http://www.thrane.name/Pictures/PAW/files/page7-1000-full.html
K-5, DA*16-50@50mm, 1/250s, f/5.6, ISO200
DagT
http://www.thrane.name/
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above
Hey, nice, ghostly and elegant! -T
On Sun, Feb 27, 2011 at 2:17 PM, DagT wrote:
> http://www.thrane.name/Pictures/PAW/files/page7-1000-full.html
> K-5, DA*16-50@50mm, 1/250s, f/5.6, ISO200
>
>
> DagT
> http://www.thrane.name/
>
> --
> PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
> PDML@pdml.net
> http://pdml.ne
List
Subject: PAW60 - Fog
http://www.thrane.name/Pictures/PAW/files/page7-1000-full.html
K-5, DA*16-50@50mm, 1/250s, f/5.6, ISO200
DagT
http://www.thrane.name/
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit
Otherwordly and beautiful!
Dan
http://blogs.delphiforums.com/n/blogs/blog.aspx?nav=main&webtag=djm1963&entry=67
On Sun, Feb 27, 2011 at 5:17 PM, DagT wrote:
> http://www.thrane.name/Pictures/PAW/files/page7-1000-full.html
> K-5, DA*16-50@50mm, 1/250s, f/5.6, ISO200
>
>
> DagT
> http://www.thrane
Very lovely as I would expect from one as hated as you are. I always look
forward to your weekly postings!
There is a touch of red on a tree trunk to the right. Is that an artifact of
the camera + processing, or is it a human artifact? If the later, maybe render
this in B&W?
stan
On Feb 27, 2
On Feb 27, 2011, at 7:50 PM, Stan Halpin wrote:
> Very lovely as I would expect from one as hated as you are. I always look
> forward to your weekly postings!
> There is a touch of red on a tree trunk to the right. Is that an artifact of
> the camera + processing, or is it a human artifact? If
Love it! Cheers, Christine
- Original Message -
From: "DagT"
To: "Pentax-Discuss Mail List"
Sent: Sunday, February 27, 2011 4:17 PM
Subject: PAW60 - Fog
http://www.thrane.name/Pictures/PAW/files/page7-1000-full.html
K-5, DA*16-50@50mm, 1/250s, f/5.6
Wonderful shot.
Dave
On Sun, Feb 27, 2011 at 5:17 PM, DagT wrote:
> http://www.thrane.name/Pictures/PAW/files/page7-1000-full.html
> K-5, DA*16-50@50mm, 1/250s, f/5.6, ISO200
>
>
> DagT
> http://www.thrane.name/
>
> --
> PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
> PDML@pdml.net
> http://pdml.net/mailman/lis
Thanks, Christine, Dave, Dan, Jeffrey, Tim and Stan!
And well spotted Stan. You are right about the marking. I must admit that I
didn´t notice it before you mentioned it. I´m still not sure if I should remove
it, enhance it or just let it be as a small irritating detail .-)
DagT
http://www.thr
erful mood!
Jack
--- On Tue, 3/1/11, DagT wrote:
> From: DagT
> Subject: Re: PAW60 - Fog
> To: "Pentax-Discuss Mail List"
> Date: Tuesday, March 1, 2011, 1:09 PM
> Thanks, Christine, Dave, Dan,
> Jeffrey, Tim and Stan!
>
> And well spotted Stan. You are right
I finally looked --
the red line would be a trail marker... and person could easily be
lost... so... leave it in...
(actually, I"d never have seen it if someone else had not ponted it out. )
ann
David J Brooks wrote:
Wonderful shot.
Dave
On Sun, Feb 27, 2011 at 5:17 PM, DagT wrote:
Good point Ann. It is a part of the story in that way, and it that sense it
shouldn´t be too easy to see it...
DagT
Den 2. mars 2011 kl. 01.56 skrev Ann Sanfedele:
> I finally looked --
> the red line would be a trail marker... and person could easily be lost...
> so... leave it in...
> (actu
Dag, in my so very humble opinion, a bit on the left can be lost. Or the
branches growing off the left-bottom corner of the frame doctored out...
I still hate you, but the way.
Boris
On 2/28/2011 12:17 AM, DagT wrote:
http://www.thrane.name/Pictures/PAW/files/page7-1000-full.html
K-5, DA*16-
Thanks!
It is always nice to know that I am hated .-)
I see your point regarding the branches. The picture would be more quiet
without them.
DagT
Den 3. mars 2011 kl. 15.25 skrev Boris Liberman:
> Dag, in my so very humble opinion, a bit on the left can be lost. Or the
> branches growing off
14 matches
Mail list logo