On 8/31/2011 4:02 PM, frank theriault wrote:
On Mon, Aug 29, 2011 at 10:11 PM, Walt Gilbertldott...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi all,
I saw some horses out in the pasture across the street from my home today
and figured I might as well amble over there with the camera before I send
it off to see what
On Mon, Aug 29, 2011 at 10:11 PM, Walt Gilbert ldott...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi all,
I saw some horses out in the pasture across the street from my home today
and figured I might as well amble over there with the camera before I send
it off to see what it's going to set me back to have the
Hi all,
I saw some horses out in the pasture across the street from my home
today and figured I might as well amble over there with the camera
before I send it off to see what it's going to set me back to have the
delaminating viewfinder replaced. Once again, it's the K 50/1.4 on the
K-x --
Very nice, but bothers me the foot is chopped off at the bottom. While
Christine's petal didn't bother me, this does. Had a teacher once who insisted
animals should not have appendages chopped off (if shot full body),
because it would bother our eyes in a completion kind of way. (He said it
Thanks, Marnie!
I was kind of disappointed to see that, too. There wasn't much I could
do to avoid it, as she was coming right at me and it was all I could do
to keep her in focus. But, I just couldn't pitch it. I was too pleased
with the fact that she was still in the focal plane by the
5 matches
Mail list logo