Thanks to all for the help with this image.
I think this final rendering (see link below) is about as good as I'm going to
get. Basically I've nudged the mid tones a bit and then desaturated both RGB
and red slightly. This also has the effect of lessening the intense orange
colour.
I've also
Brian Walters wrote:
> Thanks to all for the help with this image.
>
> I think this final rendering (see link below) is about as good as I'm going
> to get. Basically I've nudged the mid tones a bit and then desaturated both
> RGB and red slightly. This also has the effect of lessening the int
Like #3. To my mind it's a more accurate rust color. I think #2 B&W is
the better of the two, but I relate more to the color version because
of the rust.
Jack
--- Brian Walters <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Thanks to all for the help with this image.
>
> I think this final rendering (see link be
The contrast in the second conversion is still a bit high for my
tastes. It really doesn't need that much. Still it is an improvement.
Doug Franklin wrote:
> Brian Walters wrote:
>
>> Thanks to all for the help with this image.
>>
>> I think this final rendering (see link below) is about as
I still prefer the original Brian.
It's got a very strong Outback feel to it.
Cheers,
Dave
On 11/1/07, Jack Davis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Like #3. To my mind it's a more accurate rust color. I think #2 B&W is
> the better of the two, but I relate more to the color version because
> of the
FTR, I'm not at all sure my monitor is that consistent with others,
especially having to do with brightness and contrast.
I Huey it occasionally, but that's it.
Jack
--- David Savage <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I still prefer the original Brian.
>
> It's got a very strong Outback feel to it.
>
6 matches
Mail list logo
