Hi Boris,
sorry for the late reply. No, no reflectors or else. It was early
in the morning within the shadow of a hill.
Best regards, Hans.
Hi all,
was for long not present but I'm back. What do you think of this
one:
http://www.photo.net/photodb/photo?photo_id=3278186
Best
On 4/13/05, [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
From: Hans Imglueck [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: 2005/04/13 Wed PM 02:27:32 GMT
To: pentax-discuss@pdml.net
Subject: PESO: Back with ladybug
Hi all,
was for long not present but I'm back. What do you think of this
one
frank theriault wrote:
On 4/13/05, [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
From: Hans Imglueck [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: 2005/04/13 Wed PM 02:27:32 GMT
To: pentax-discuss@pdml.net
Subject: PESO: Back with ladybug
Hi all,
was for long not present but I'm back. What do you think of this
one:
http
http://www.photo.net/photodb/photo?photo_id=3278186
Hans, this is a beautiful photograph.
Joe
Hi!
Hi all,
was for long not present but I'm back. What do you think of this
one:
http://www.photo.net/photodb/photo?photo_id=3278186
Best regards, Hans.
Hans, this is excellent. I have a question if you don't mind. Were you
doing anything with the light - reflectors and such? Or it was just shot
Hi all,
was for long not present but I'm back. What do you think of this
one:
http://www.photo.net/photodb/photo?photo_id=3278186
Best regards, Hans.
--
Hans Imglueck
+++ GMX - Die erste Adresse für Mail, Message, More +++
1 GB Mailbox bereits in GMX FreeMail http://www.gmx.net/de/go/mail
From: Hans Imglueck [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: 2005/04/13 Wed PM 02:27:32 GMT
To: pentax-discuss@pdml.net
Subject: PESO: Back with ladybug
Hi all,
was for long not present but I'm back. What do you think of this
one:
http://www.photo.net/photodb/photo?photo_id=3278186
I think
I really like this picture. I think it would be better
if either the depth of field were a little greater
(I'm surprised it is =so= shallow at f/8!), or if the
plane of focus were a little closer to the lens so
that the bug's eyes were in focus.
Rick
--- Hans Imglueck [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
http://www.photo.net/photodb/photo?photo_id=3278186
great shot, Hans, with somewhat subdued colors for my taste. I like
macro shots presented in juicy, bold colors.
Bedo.
Yes you are right - only a little bit more back with the camera
and that would be a really good shot. At scale 1:1 there is not
more DOF. Thanks for your comment, Hans.
I really like this picture. I think it would be better
if either the depth of field were a little greater
(I'm surprised it
Are the asian ones more brown? A couple of people here are thinking
that the ladybugs were formerly much more red. That would be the
explanation. Thanks, Hans.
From: Hans Imglueck [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: 2005/04/13 Wed PM 02:27:32 GMT
To: pentax-discuss@pdml.net
Subject: PESO: Back
Hans Imglueck wrote:
Are the asian ones more brown? A couple of people here are thinking
that the ladybugs were formerly much more red. That would be the
explanation. Thanks, Hans.
One of the reasons the Harlequin is so called is because its colours are
so variable. IIRC, the main identifying
On Wed, 13 Apr 2005 16:27:32 +0200 (MEST), Hans Imglueck wrote:
http://www.photo.net/photodb/photo?photo_id=3278186
Very nice, Hans. I particularly like where you put the in focus area.
TTYL, DougF KG4LMZ
Beautiful, Hans. And welcome back.
I'd cut off 10% off the bottom.
Regards
Jens Bladt
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://hjem.get2net.dk/bladt
-Oprindelig meddelelse-
Fra: Hans Imglueck [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sendt: 13. april 2005 20:03
Til: pentax-discuss@pdml.net
Emne: Re: PESO: Back
14 matches
Mail list logo