I like this a lot.
Rick
> On Jan 10, 2021, at 12:23 PM, Toine wrote:
>
> To late for the PUG:
>
> https://www.repiuk.nl/albums/new/#&gid=1&pid=006-033-img4519
>
> Toine
>
> --
> PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
> PDML@pdml.net
> http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
> to UNSUBSCRIBE f
That's nice, it's really too bad it didn't make it into the PUG.
On 1/10/2021 12:23 PM, Toine wrote:
To late for the PUG:
https://www.repiuk.nl/albums/new/#&gid=1&pid=006-033-img4519
Toine
--
Any idiot can shoot with a Canon, Nikon, or Sony, it takes a special kind of
idiot to use a Pentax.
Excellent!
> On 10 Jan 2021, at 17:24, Toine wrote:
>
> To late for the PUG:
>
> https://www.repiuk.nl/albums/new/#&gid=1&pid=006-033-img4519
>
> Toine
>
> --
> PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
> PDML@pdml.net
> http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
> to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, ple
Glad you like it. Rainy weather almost every day now. Normally I don't
care, not this year. Today was an exception.
On Sun, 10 Jan 2021, 22:13 ann sanfedele, wrote:
> This is nice but the vertical in the woods taken same day is
> particularly lovely to me
>
> IMG4501.jpg.. I want to walk down
This is nice but the vertical in the woods taken same day is
particularly lovely to me
IMG4501.jpg.. I want to walk down that path..
Also, your PUG shot is tied for 1st with fillipe in my personal faves
list .. no one said we had to have bad weather :-)
ann
On 1/10/2021 12:23 PM, Toine
To late for the PUG:
https://www.repiuk.nl/albums/new/#&gid=1&pid=006-033-img4519
Toine
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow
the directions.
So clear up to the water line. Quite nice.
Message: 3
Date: Fri, 13 Jun 2014 20:30:28 -0400
From: "P.J. Alling"
To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List
Subject: PESO -- Fog Offshore
Message-ID: <539b97a4.7050...@gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; forma
Excellent.
On Fri, Jun 13, 2014 at 8:30 PM, P.J. Alling wrote:
> https://dl.dropboxusercontent.com/u/1604247/PESO/PESO%20--%20fogoffshore.html
>
> Equipment: Pentax K-5II w/smc Pentax FA 43mm f1.9 Limited.
>
> As usual comments are welcome but may be totally ignored.
>
> --
> A newspaper is a de
I liked the image.
Tried other crops and failed, by the way :)
Bulent
-
http://patoloji.gen.tr
http://celasun.wordpress.com/
http://www.flickr.com/photos/bc_the_path/
http://photo.net/photodb/user?user_id=2226822
http://www.penta
Mighty peaceful looking.
On 6/13/2014 8:30 PM, P.J. Alling wrote:
https://dl.dropboxusercontent.com/u/1604247/PESO/PESO%20--%20fogoffshore.html
Equipment: Pentax K-5II w/smc Pentax FA 43mm f1.9 Limited.
As usual comments are welcome but may be totally ignored.
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail
Nice, P.J. nice mood, nice balance of elements - well did I mention nice?
ann
On 6/13/2014 20:30, P.J. Alling wrote:
https://dl.dropboxusercontent.com/u/1604247/PESO/PESO%20--%20fogoffshore.html
Equipment: Pentax K-5II w/smc Pentax FA 43mm f1.9 Limited.
As usual comments are welcome but m
Strong mood.
Dan Matyola
http://www.pentaxphotogallery.com/danieljmatyola
On Fri, Jun 13, 2014 at 8:30 PM, P.J. Alling wrote:
> https://dl.dropboxusercontent.com/u/1604247/PESO/PESO%20--%20fogoffshore.html
>
> Equipment: Pentax K-5II w/smc Pentax FA 43mm f1.9 Limited.
>
> As usual comments are
https://dl.dropboxusercontent.com/u/1604247/PESO/PESO%20--%20fogoffshore.html
Equipment: Pentax K-5II w/smc Pentax FA 43mm f1.9 Limited.
As usual comments are welcome but may be totally ignored.
--
A newspaper is a device for making the ignorant more ignorant, and the crazy,
crazier.
-
Just saw Tony Sweet's presentation at Grandfather Mountain.
Nothing - N O T H I N G - is an extreem form of manipulation to Tony.
Boggles my mind, but he sells the stuff.
Regards, Bob S.
On Fri, Jun 3, 2011 at 2:00 PM, Bulent Celasun wrote:
> Frank,
> I liked the image in spite of the already me
Frank,
I liked the image in spite of the already mentioned blemishes.
Also, the idea of flipping either the upper or the lower part of the
image (left to right) came to my mind.
Should be easy especially with a noisy original (markings will be
easier to hide).
Of course it may be an extreme case of
On Thu, Jun 2, 2011 at 12:29 AM, Christine Aguila wrote:
> Wow! I've never seen anything like that, Frank. Thanks for sharing.
Yeah, I've never seen anything quite like it, either.
Glad you enjoyed it, and thanks to everyone else who looked and commented.
cheers,
frank
--
"Sharpness is a b
Wow! I've never seen anything like that, Frank. Thanks for sharing.
Cheers, Christine
- Original Message -
From: "frank theriault"
To: "Pentax-Discuss Mail List"
Sent: Wednesday, June 01, 2011 2:20 PM
Subject: PESO - Fog Rolls In
I posted this on my c
Nice cloud
Dave
On Wed, Jun 1, 2011 at 3:20 PM, frank theriault
wrote:
> I posted this on my colour photoblog last week, and because it's
> technically lacking (noise, purple fringing, etc.) I didn't post it
> on-list. However today I've changed my mind. Despite the technical
> limitations, I
That is definitely worth posting, Frank. It is an interesting image
with a strong sense of focus. I guess that is what they mean by a
"fog bank."
Dan
On Wed, Jun 1, 2011 at 3:20 PM, frank theriault
wrote:
> I posted this on my colour photoblog last week, and because it's
> technically lacking
I agree. It is an interesting and unusual cloud.
Glad you posted!
Jack
--- On Wed, 6/1/11, frank theriault wrote:
> From: frank theriault
> Subject: PESO - Fog Rolls In
> To: "Pentax-Discuss Mail List"
> Date: Wednesday, June 1, 2011, 12:20 PM
> I posted this on m
I posted this on my colour photoblog last week, and because it's
technically lacking (noise, purple fringing, etc.) I didn't post it
on-list. However today I've changed my mind. Despite the technical
limitations, I think it's a kind of cool pic. I saw this cloud
rolling across the lake:
http://
Gives a whole new dimension to the term "evergreen"!
--- David J Brooks <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> I tried to do a B&W conversion, but for some
> reason,, the coniferious
> trees in #3 stay green.
>
> Dave
>
> On Jan 13, 2008 10:03 PM, Rick Womer
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > The first
Thanks Rick.
Yes full colour, just a tad of + exposure in LR.
I tried to do a B&W conversion, but for some reason,, the coniferious
trees in #3 stay green.
Dave
On Jan 13, 2008 10:03 PM, Rick Womer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> The first and the third are my favorites. Are they
> B&W conversion
The first and the third are my favorites. Are they
B&W conversions or are they "full color"
representations of what the day was like?
Rick
--- David J Brooks <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Took Liz to her school bus on Sunday (she parks it
> at the farm) and it
> was pretty darn foggy. I did not
Thanks Scott.
I have a version i cropped the right side a bit, and i think it works better
Dave
On Jan 12, 2008 5:26 PM, Scott Loveless <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> David J Brooks wrote:
> > Took Liz to her school bus on Sunday (she parks it at the farm) and it
> > was pretty darn foggy. I did n
Thanks Godfrey.
I'm working on them a bit more.
Dave
On Jan 12, 2008 4:16 PM, Godfrey DiGiorgi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Of these three, I think Fence really makes it.
>
> The other two could stand a little cropping here, a little more
> rendering work there, but are worth putting some time i
David J Brooks wrote:
> Took Liz to her school bus on Sunday (she parks it at the farm) and it
> was pretty darn foggy. I did not bring a camera
> and missed out on some shots.
> Well, the fog was with us Monday, and i ventured out for a while. Took
> a few photos and after almost getting hit a few
Of these three, I think Fence really makes it.
The other two could stand a little cropping here, a little more
rendering work there, but are worth putting some time into.
Godfrey
On Jan 8, 2008, at 7:57 AM, David J Brooks wrote:
> http://photo.net/photodb/photo?photo_id=6817896
> Fence
>
> ht
e than as you now have it.
>
> Kenneth Waller
> http://www.tinyurl.com/272u2f
>
> - Original Message -
> From: "David J Brooks" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Subject: Peso Fog shots at the farm
>
>
> > Took Liz to her school bus on Sunday (she parks
From: "David J Brooks" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Pentax Discuss"
Cc: "Barb Brooks" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; "Kee Chong" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>;
"Harry Bolton" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; "Yvette Sheppard" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>;
&
t;[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Peso Fog shots at the farm
> Took Liz to her school bus on Sunday (she parks it at the farm) and it
> was pretty darn foggy. I did not bring a camera
> and missed out on some shots.
> Well, the fog was with us Monday, and i ventured out for a while. Took
> a
Thanks Jack.
A+1.3 EV on P mode seemed to work best. I would have liked to stay out
longer, but i knew someone would hit me.
Dave
On Jan 8, 2008 11:23 AM, Jack Davis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> You took pleasing advantage of the soft fog conditions. Nice!
>
> Jack
>
> --- David J Brooks <[EMAIL
Thanks Ann.
This is a pond i have shot many times before, but the new owners are
completely redoing the two ponds. The little trees and bridge are new.
I thought i would try and use them as a frame, but maybe its not
working.
I'll try a B&W and see how that looks
Dave
On Jan 8, 2008 11:23 AM, ann
You took pleasing advantage of the soft fog conditions. Nice!
Jack
--- David J Brooks <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Took Liz to her school bus on Sunday (she parks it at the farm) and
> it
> was pretty darn foggy. I did not bring a camera
> and missed out on some shots.
> Well, the fog was with us
I like the first two best -- and maybe the first one very best...
The third doesn't work for me because the three little evergreens in
front lack grace and dignity.
If you are making that comment on them, though, maybe this would work
better in real BW.
I wish we had some of that snow here - it
Took Liz to her school bus on Sunday (she parks it at the farm) and it
was pretty darn foggy. I did not bring a camera
and missed out on some shots.
Well, the fog was with us Monday, and i ventured out for a while. Took
a few photos and after almost getting hit a few times headed home. Why
is it wh
God forbid.
Tim
Mostly harmless (just plain Norwegian)
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
frank theriault
Sent: 2. oktober 2006 18:41
To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List
Subject: Re: PESO - Fog
On 9/25/06, Cotty <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote
On 9/25/06, Cotty <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On 25/9/06, Bruce Dayton, discombobulated, unleashed:
>
> >Thanks, yes, it is a wind surfer.
>
> You could always use the clone tool...and have a fleet of them :-)
YES!
They could be in formation, perhaps spelling out patriotic sayings,
like "God Ble
On 9/25/06, Bruce Dayton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I thought it interesting to see the fog blowing into the bay. The
> Golden Gate Bridge is partially shrouded but you can still see out in
> the bay, some sun that hasn't been obscured yet.
>
> Pentax *istD, A 70-210/4, Handheld
> ISO 400, 1/100
Hi!
> I thought it interesting to see the fog blowing into the bay. The
> Golden Gate Bridge is partially shrouded but you can still see out in
> the bay, some sun that hasn't been obscured yet.
>
> Pentax *istD, A 70-210/4, Handheld
> ISO 400, 1/1000 sec @ f/8.0
> http://www.daytonphoto.com/PAW
In a message dated 9/25/2006 1:35:05 PM Pacific Daylight Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
I thought it interesting to see the fog blowing into the bay. The
Golden Gate Bridge is partially shrouded but you can still see out in
the bay, some sun that hasn't been obscured yet.
Pentax *istD, A 70-210
Certainly a different take on an oft photographed scene.
Kenneth Waller
- Original Message -
From: "Bruce Dayton" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: PESO - Fog
>I thought it interesting to see the fog blowing into the bay. The
> Golden Gate Bridge is partially shro
Pentax *istD, A 70-210/4, Handheld
ISO 400, 1/1000 sec @ f/8.0
http://www.daytonphoto.com/PAW/bkd_3439.htm
-
Nice, Bruce. Reminds me of growing up there. So many times I've seen
that. Thanks.
Joe
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
I vote to keep the windsurfer. It's a fantastic detail in a lovely shot.
I think it's great that something occupying so little of the photo is
commanding so much attention. Without it you've got just another picture
of the SF Bay. (In a related story:
http://www.theonion.com/content/node/36577
Gotta lose the wind surfer. It's a major distraction
in a lovely shot.
Rick
--- Bruce Dayton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Thanks, yes, it is a wind surfer.
>
> --
> Best regards,
> Bruce
>
>
> Monday, September 25, 2006, 3:10:54 PM, you wrote:
>
> C> On 25/9/06, Bruce Dayton, discombobulat
I like the shot but I think I'd have softened the windsurfer a
little. The sail is so sharply defined it looks out of place!
Godfrey
> Very nice. Well composed.
> I too am curious as to what that sharply defined object is in the
> foreground.
> l
>>> I thought it interesting to see the fog blow
Very nice. Well composed.
I too am curious as to what that sharply defined object is in the
foreground.
Paul
On Sep 25, 2006, at 5:08 PM, Christian wrote:
> Bruce Dayton wrote:
>> I thought it interesting to see the fog blowing into the bay. The
>> Golden Gate Bridge is partially shrouded but y
On 25/9/06, Bruce Dayton, discombobulated, unleashed:
>Thanks, yes, it is a wind surfer.
You could always use the clone tool...and have a fleet of them :-)
--
Cheers,
Cotty
___/\__
|| (O) | People, Places, Pastiche
||=|http://www.cottysnaps.com
Thanks, yes, it is a wind surfer.
--
Best regards,
Bruce
Monday, September 25, 2006, 3:10:54 PM, you wrote:
C> On 25/9/06, Bruce Dayton, discombobulated, unleashed:
>>I thought it interesting to see the fog blowing into the bay. The
>>Golden Gate Bridge is partially shrouded but you can stil
On 25/9/06, Bruce Dayton, discombobulated, unleashed:
>I thought it interesting to see the fog blowing into the bay. The
>Golden Gate Bridge is partially shrouded but you can still see out in
>the bay, some sun that hasn't been obscured yet.
>
>Pentax *istD, A 70-210/4, Handheld
>ISO 400, 1/1000
Others have asked about the thing in the bottom of the frame - it is a
surfboarder holding the kite to propel him around. He was all over
around the bottom of the bridge while I was there. The ropes were
fairly long so he doesn't show up too much.
I played around some with the saturation/contras
Nice one, Bruce. As someone else commented, a little more
contrast/saturation may help - try playing around with it. Lose the
bird-like thing in the lower center and then there will be more focus on
the boat running under the bridge, which, imo, is an important part of the
pic. Just curious, how
Great shot, Bruce.
The blue thing looks like a kite, but I can't see the person.
Jostein
On 9/25/06, Rick Womer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Beautiful! A bit higher contrast or saturation might
> improve it a bit.
>
> What's the blue thing in the right foreground? It's
> so clear and so sharp
Bruce Dayton wrote:
> I thought it interesting to see the fog blowing into the bay. The
> Golden Gate Bridge is partially shrouded but you can still see out in
> the bay, some sun that hasn't been obscured yet.
>
> Pentax *istD, A 70-210/4, Handheld
> ISO 400, 1/1000 sec @ f/8.0
> http://www.dayt
Beautiful! A bit higher contrast or saturation might
improve it a bit.
What's the blue thing in the right foreground? It's
so clear and so sharp that it seems superimposed on
the pic, rather than part of it.
Rick
--- Bruce Dayton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I thought it interesting to see th
I thought it interesting to see the fog blowing into the bay. The
Golden Gate Bridge is partially shrouded but you can still see out in
the bay, some sun that hasn't been obscured yet.
Pentax *istD, A 70-210/4, Handheld
ISO 400, 1/1000 sec @ f/8.0
http://www.daytonphoto.com/PAW/bkd_3439.htm
Comm
56 matches
Mail list logo
