On 11/6/13 1:42 PM, Mark Roberts wrote:
OK, so Low Dynamic Range isn't really a new Photoshop technique or
anything. But it kind of describes this photo. I new there was a good
image in there, but it took me a long time to come up with a rendering
I really like.
A nice render. I think I'd leave the thing on the right. That last pillar
contributes a lot to the composition. I might try to clone out the foreground
architecture, but it's a big job given the shape of the pillar and its base.
Paul
On Nov 7, 2013, at 9:05 AM, Doug Brewer
: Thursday, November 7, 2013 6:51 AM
Subject: Re: PESO: New photographic style - LDR!
A nice render. I think I'd leave the thing on the right. That last pillar
contributes a lot to the composition. I might try to clone out the foreground
architecture, but it's a big job given the shape
Paul Stenquist pnstenqu...@comcast.net wrote:
A nice render. I think I'd leave the thing on the right. That last
pillar contributes a lot to the composition.
Yep. I included it in the composition deliberately.
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
On Wed, Nov 06, 2013, Thomas Bohn wrote:
On 6 November 2013 19:42, Mark Roberts postmas...@robertstech.com wrote:
OK, so Low Dynamic Range isn't really a new Photoshop technique or
anything. But it kind of describes this photo. I new there was a good
image in there, but it took me a long
On Thu, Nov 7, 2013 at 11:37 AM, Aahz Maruch a...@pobox.com wrote:
On Wed, Nov 06, 2013, Thomas Bohn wrote:
On 6 November 2013 19:42, Mark Roberts postmas...@robertstech.com wrote:
OK, so Low Dynamic Range isn't really a new Photoshop technique or
anything. But it kind of describes this
OK, so Low Dynamic Range isn't really a new Photoshop technique or
anything. But it kind of describes this photo. I new there was a good
image in there, but it took me a long time to come up with a rendering
I really like.
http://www.robertstech.com/pages/fotoblog/7db06303.htm
--
Mark Roberts -
works for me
Dave
On Wed, Nov 6, 2013 at 1:42 PM, Mark Roberts postmas...@robertstech.com wrote:
OK, so Low Dynamic Range isn't really a new Photoshop technique or
anything. But it kind of describes this photo. I new there was a good
image in there, but it took me a long time to come up with
I love that, Mark.
-- Walt
On 11/6/2013 12:42 PM, Mark Roberts wrote:
OK, so Low Dynamic Range isn't really a new Photoshop technique or
anything. But it kind of describes this photo. I new there was a good
image in there, but it took me a long time to come up with a rendering
I really like.
I like that a LOT, no acronym required.
On Wed, Nov 6, 2013 at 12:47 PM, Walt ldott...@gmail.com wrote:
I love that, Mark.
-- Walt
On 11/6/2013 12:42 PM, Mark Roberts wrote:
OK, so Low Dynamic Range isn't really a new Photoshop technique or
anything. But it kind of describes this photo.
Great rendering indeed, Mark... Not sure about whether the Dynamic
Range is indeed Low or not, but I just like what I see.
On Wed, Nov 6, 2013 at 8:42 PM, Mark Roberts postmas...@robertstech.com wrote:
OK, so Low Dynamic Range isn't really a new Photoshop technique or
anything. But it kind of
I would be disturb by the thing on the right edge. But otherwise I
have to agree, it looks really nice and well.
Thomas
On 6 November 2013 19:42, Mark Roberts postmas...@robertstech.com wrote:
OK, so Low Dynamic Range isn't really a new Photoshop technique or
anything. But it kind of describes
I believe you have found it. I don't know what the original looks like, but
this is excellent!
--
Bruce
--
Sent from Sony Tablet S
Mark Roberts postmas...@robertstech.com wrote:
OK, so Low Dynamic Range isn't really a new Photoshop technique or
anything. But it kind of describes this
photographic style - LDR!
OK, so Low Dynamic Range isn't really a new Photoshop technique or
anything. But it kind of describes this photo. I new there was a good
image in there, but it took me a long time to come up with a rendering
I really like.
http://www.robertstech.com/pages/fotoblog/7db06303.htm
Beautiful scene and rendering, Mark. Looks quite painterly to me. Well
worth deliberating over.
On Wed, Nov 6, 2013 at 1:42 PM, Mark Roberts postmas...@robertstech.com wrote:
OK, so Low Dynamic Range isn't really a new Photoshop technique or
anything. But it kind of describes this photo. I new
The same from me...:-)
Regards
Jens
--
Treat others as you would like to be treated yourself.
On Nov 6, 2013 20:11 Thomas Bohn thb...@gmail.com wrote:
I would be disturb by the thing on the right edge. But otherwise I
have to agree, it looks really nice and well.
Thomas
On 6 November
Lovely photo, a nice rendering.
I am often amused when I read all the hubbub about “high dynamic range.” I
spend a lot of my time in rendering figuring out what in the captured image is
unimportant and how to get rid of it, more time than I spend trying to stuff
more into the photo, whether
OK, so Low Dynamic Range isn't really a new Photoshop technique or
anything.
But it kind of describes this photo. I new there was a good image in there,
but it took me a long time to come up with a rendering I really like.
http://www.robertstech.com/pages/fotoblog/7db06303.htm
--
Mark Roberts -
On 11/6/2013 12:42 PM, Mark Roberts wrote:
OK, so Low Dynamic Range isn't really a new Photoshop technique or
anything. But it kind of describes this photo. I new there was a good
image in there, but it took me a long time to come up with a rendering
I really like.
Godfrey DiGiorgi wrote:
I am often amused when I read all the hubbub about high dynamic range. I
spend
a lot of my time in rendering figuring out what in the captured image is
unimportant
and how to get rid of it, more time than I spend trying to stuff more into the
photo,
whether it be
Sure beats a lot of HDR I've seen and I would like it even without the
person in the photo.
On Wed, Nov 6, 2013 at 11:11 PM, Mark Roberts
postmas...@robertstech.com wrote:
Godfrey DiGiorgi wrote:
I am often amused when I read all the hubbub about “high dynamic range.” I
spend
a lot of my time
The passer by's rich red attire is what I would have chosen.
Jack
- Original Message -
From: Mark Roberts postmas...@robertstech.com
To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List pdml@pdml.net
Cc:
Sent: Wednesday, November 6, 2013 1:11 PM
Subject: Re: PESO: New photographic style - LDR!
Godfrey
On 06/11/2013 12:42 PM, Mark Roberts wrote:
OK, so Low Dynamic Range isn't really a new Photoshop technique or
anything. But it kind of describes this photo. I new there was a good
image in there, but it took me a long time to come up with a rendering
I really like.
Looks like an example of excellent tonemapping.
On Wed, Nov 6, 2013 at 1:42 PM, Mark Roberts postmas...@robertstech.com wrote:
OK, so Low Dynamic Range isn't really a new Photoshop technique or
anything. But it kind of describes this photo. I new there was a good
image in there, but it took me
On 6/11/13, Mark Roberts, discombobulated, unleashed:
OK, so Low Dynamic Range isn't really a new Photoshop technique or
anything. But it kind of describes this photo. I new there was a good
image in there, but it took me a long time to come up with a rendering
I really like.
me too...
of course I'd like to see the original - you know me, nothing but
trouble :-)
ann
On 11/6/2013 15:05, Jens wrote:
The same from me...:-)
Regards
Jens
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML,
On 11/6/2013 16:11, Mark Roberts wrote:
Godfrey DiGiorgi wrote:
I am often amused when I read all the hubbub about “high dynamic range.” I spend
a lot of my time in rendering figuring out what in the captured image is
unimportant
and how to get rid of it, more time than I spend trying to
27 matches
Mail list logo
