I was wondering if I said that:-) I meant in the flash of course. But
I'm old:-)).
Paul
On Apr 29, 2007, at 2:40 PM, Rick Womer wrote:
> This is better.
>
> Fully charged NiMH batteries in the K10D?? Or, did you
> mean in the flash?
>
> Rick
>
>
> --- Paul Stenquist <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
Paul,
I think the second looks a lot better for the sharpness in the head and beek.
Regards, Bob S.
On 4/29/07, Christian <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Paul Stenquist wrote:
> > I replaced my soft Pecker with the next frame.
> > http://www.photo.net/photodb/photo?photo_id=5907141&size=lg
> >
> > He
This is better.
Fully charged NiMH batteries in the K10D?? Or, did you
mean in the flash?
Rick
--- Paul Stenquist <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I replaced my soft Pecker with the next frame.
>
http://www.photo.net/photodb/photo?photo_id=5907141&size=lg
>
> This pose isn't quite as happy, and t
Yeah, they're a bit noisy. I have to try to shoot at ISO 400. They're
off the monopod, but that's not much more secure than handholding.
Thanks for the feedback and the bird ID.
Paul
On Apr 29, 2007, at 9:50 AM, Christian wrote:
> Paul Stenquist wrote:
>> I replaced my soft Pecker with the nex
Paul Stenquist wrote:
> I replaced my soft Pecker with the next frame.
> http://www.photo.net/photodb/photo?photo_id=5907141&size=lg
>
> Here's the previous pecker:
> http://www.photo.net/photodb/photo?photo_id=5905654&size=lg
Hey, Paul, honestly both shots appear excessively noisy and quite soft
Thanks Jack. I'll have a look.
Paul
On Apr 29, 2007, at 9:34 AM, Jack Davis wrote:
> I agree this is "better". I would try a left and top crop, however.
> Obviously, I feel the limb is too dominant and after cropping, the top
> would then need to be brought into balance.
>
> Jack
> --- Paul Stenqu
I agree this is "better". I would try a left and top crop, however.
Obviously, I feel the limb is too dominant and after cropping, the top
would then need to be brought into balance.
Jack
--- Paul Stenquist <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I replaced my soft Pecker with the next frame.
> http://www.p
I replaced my soft Pecker with the next frame.
http://www.photo.net/photodb/photo?photo_id=5907141&size=lg
This pose isn't quite as happy, and there's a bit of diffusion in his
wing feathers, probably caused by a foreground branch. But overall I
think it's better, but probably won't make the c
8 matches
Mail list logo
