Thanks Paul.
I just found out that I qualify for an academic license, which is a
lot cheaper than the regular version, and ordered Photoshop. Now all I
hope is that I will actually find the time to learn the very basics,
at least.
Marcus
--
Am 25.03.2008 um 18:39 schrieb [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Yes, it's a PhotoShop process. I should have been clear about that. PhotoShop
is quite expensive, but it's also very powerful. I'd be lost wihout it.
However, I know others do just fine using other software. I'm not sure, but PS
Elements, which is much less expensive, may have channel mixer cap
Paul, I assume you're talking about Adobe Photoshop (which I am
hesitating to buy, because I am not sure if I really need such
expensive software)?
Marcus
--
Am 13.03.2008 um 15:59 schrieb [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> Thanks Marcus (and all others who responded).
> I use the channel mixer for BW con
On Thu, Mar 13, 2008 at 6:39 AM, Paul Stenquist <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Is everyone sleeping? I've been overpesoed lately, but since there's
> no activity here, I'll offer another. Had I to shoot this over again,
> I'd stop down a wee bit to get the rear figures in focus as well as
> the fr
Good eye Paul.
As Rick said, an all to typical scene these days.:-)
I can't even get mine to work 1/2 the time in the US.
Dave
On Thu, Mar 13, 2008 at 6:39 AM, Paul Stenquist <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Is everyone sleeping? I've been overpesoed lately, but since there's
> no activity here, I
Cotty wrote:
> On 13/3/08, Godfrey DiGiorgi, discombobulated, unleashed:
>
>
>> This isn't the best in your cafe people series, but it does point up
>> an increasing issue I find in my street shooting: it's become harder
>> to find situations of people interacting with people, they're all
On 13/3/08, Godfrey DiGiorgi, discombobulated, unleashed:
>This isn't the best in your cafe people series, but it does point up
>an increasing issue I find in my street shooting: it's become harder
>to find situations of people interacting with people, they're all
>distracted by their cell p
The sad fact is they're all communicating with each other...
Paul Stenquist wrote:
> Is everyone sleeping? I've been overpesoed lately, but since there's
> no activity here, I'll offer another. Had I to shoot this over again,
> I'd stop down a wee bit to get the rear figures in focus as well a
Thanks Tim. I guess it's all about individual taste. Personally, I find this
among the most interesting, although others are technically superior. I'm
pleaed that you like it.
Paul
-- Original message --
From: "Tim Bray" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Godfrey's wrong, that
I'm just pleased that y'all looked at it:-)
Paul
-- Original message --
From: Godfrey DiGiorgi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> I say poe-TAH-toe and you say poe-TAY-toe department ... Sorry, I
> disagree.
>
> G
>
> "De gustibus non disputandem."
>
> On Mar 13, 2008, at
I say poe-TAH-toe and you say poe-TAY-toe department ... Sorry, I
disagree.
G
"De gustibus non disputandem."
On Mar 13, 2008, at 9:42 AM, Tim Bray wrote:
> Godfrey's wrong, that *is* the best picture in the cafe series :) -T
>
> On Thu, Mar 13, 2008 at 7:59 AM, <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Godfrey's wrong, that *is* the best picture in the cafe series :) -T
On Thu, Mar 13, 2008 at 7:59 AM, <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Thanks Marcus (and all others who responded).
> I use the channel mixer for BW conversions most of the time. After clicking
> on "monochromatic," I usually start w
I think it was a bit underexposed, so it's somewhat noisier than the other ISO
1600 pics I've posted.'
Paul
-- Original message --
From: Rick Womer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> I like it. All too typical a moment, too, IMHO.
>
> I'm surprised at the amount of noise, si
Thanks Marcus (and all others who responded).
I use the channel mixer for BW conversions most of the time. After clicking on
"monochromatic," I usually start with about 80% red, 12% green and 10% blue,
then fiddle with the sliders. A bit less of one, a bit more of another. I just
work the number
Thanks Dave.
-- Original message --
From: "David Savage" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> On Thu, Mar 13, 2008 at 7:39 PM, Paul Stenquist <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Is everyone sleeping? I've been overpesoed lately, but since there's
> > no activity here, I'll offer anot
Good grab, Paul. (Gotta stay in the cell loop!!)
Jack
--- Paul Stenquist <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Is everyone sleeping? I've been overpesoed lately, but since there's
>
> no activity here, I'll offer another. Had I to shoot this over again,
>
> I'd stop down a wee bit to get the rear figu
I guess everyone is.
This isn't the best in your cafe people series, but it does point up
an increasing issue I find in my street shooting: it's become harder
to find situations of people interacting with people, they're all
distracted by their cell phones, music players, other devices...
G
Paul, that's a very nice shot. Reminds me of a new years eve party a
while ago, where at 0:00 everyone was busy with their cellphones...
Btw, how do you do your b/w conversions? Looks good.
Marcus
--
Am 13.03.2008 um 11:39 schrieb Paul Stenquist:
> Is everyone sleeping? I've been overpesoed
On Thu, Mar 13, 2008 at 7:39 PM, Paul Stenquist <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Is everyone sleeping? I've been overpesoed lately, but since there's
> no activity here, I'll offer another. Had I to shoot this over again,
> I'd stop down a wee bit to get the rear figures in focus as well as
> the fr
I like it. All too typical a moment, too, IMHO.
I'm surprised at the amount of noise, since it's an
ISO 1600 BW conversion on a K20.
Rick
--- Paul Stenquist <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Is everyone sleeping? I've been overpesoed lately,
> but since there's
> no activity here, I'll offer anot
Is everyone sleeping? I've been overpesoed lately, but since there's
no activity here, I'll offer another. Had I to shoot this over again,
I'd stop down a wee bit to get the rear figures in focus as well as
the front. But it's a mildly amusing pic as shot. K20D, DA50-200,
50mm, f4, 1/100th,
21 matches
Mail list logo
