Understood!
Glad you like it.
Jack
--- "P. J. Alling" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I liked that one too. I don't always comment on every PESO/PAW.
>
> Jack Davis wrote:
>
> >If I may ask, have you had a chance to check out my recent PESO:
> >Columbine?
> >Thanks for "Legy" remark.
> >
> >Jack
I liked that one too. I don't always comment on every PESO/PAW.
Jack Davis wrote:
>If I may ask, have you had a chance to check out my recent PESO:
>Columbine?
>Thanks for "Legy" remark.
>
>Jack
>
>--- "P. J. Alling" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
>
>>Jack Davis wrote:
>>
>>
>>
>>>Yeah, we
If I may ask, have you had a chance to check out my recent PESO:
Columbine?
Thanks for "Legy" remark.
Jack
--- "P. J. Alling" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Jack Davis wrote:
>
> >Yeah, we discussed the blown out blossoms. Positive film exposure is
> >fine, it's my wonderful little flatbed scanne
Jack Davis wrote:
>Yeah, we discussed the blown out blossoms. Positive film exposure is
>fine, it's my wonderful little flatbed scanner. Why doesn't that bother
>me on an example scan such as this?
>Because of there being two blossoms, the center area placement felt ok
>to me.
>I recently put up a
Yeah, we discussed the blown out blossoms. Positive film exposure is
fine, it's my wonderful little flatbed scanner. Why doesn't that bother
me on an example scan such as this?
Because of there being two blossoms, the center area placement felt ok
to me.
I recently put up a lily shot called "Leggy
The composition doesn't grab me. The flowers are too centered, maybe
cropping a bit off of one edge, or if you want it centered a somewhat
tighter crop. The contrast seems to be a bit too high for the subject
matter.
Jack Davis wrote:
>Had a couple of these lily shots ready to put up recen
Marnie, both you and Bruce are right that the blossom is somewhat blown
out.
When I put it up I touched it slightly with the burn tool, but didn't
like the total of what was happening, so backed off.
Being a MF positive, the scan was done on my cheapy flat bed.
I just checked the film and find the
It is the result of the scan. Done on my cheapy flat bed.
When I put it up I fiddled a bit with the burn tool, but it wasn't
happening, so gave it up.
Thanks, again for comments.
Jack
--- Bruce Dayton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> This is a shot that I would like to see bigger. I'm suspecting t
Thanks, Bruce.
I view this as your standard, ordinary, "pretty" shot the impact of
which increases with size.
A scene that neither offends nor excites almost no one.
Jack
--- Bruce Dayton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> This is a shot that I would like to see bigger. I'm suspecting that
> it is qui
In a message dated 8/11/2006 6:07:29 PM Pacific Daylight Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Had a couple of these lily shots ready to put up recently, but this got
left back.
Jack
http://photolightimages.com/aspupload/detail.asp?ID=165
Comments welcome.
===
Very pretty. Striking leaves. I ech
This is a shot that I would like to see bigger. I'm suspecting that
it is quite striking when viewed like that. It also seems to be a bit
blown out in the flower - don't know if this is the result of the scan
or as shot. Anyways, I like it with those two caveats.
--
Bruce
Friday, August 11,
Had a couple of these lily shots ready to put up recently, but this got
left back.
Jack
http://photolightimages.com/aspupload/detail.asp?ID=165
Comments welcome.
__
Do You Yahoo!?
Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around
12 matches
Mail list logo
