Thanks Ann and Patrick.
> On Feb 23, 2020, at 5:56 AM, ann sanfedele wrote:
>
> I like it too.. good geometry, good lighting - it doesn't matter what the
> individual bits of subject matter are if those things come together .
>
> ann
>
> On 2/23/2020 1:01 AM, patrick nelson wrote:
>> I
I like it too.. good geometry, good lighting - it doesn't matter what
the individual bits of subject matter are if those things come together .
ann
On 2/23/2020 1:01 AM, patrick nelson wrote:
I agree it is nice as a photo on its own.
Patrick
On 2/23/2020 4:50 AM, Larry Colen wrote:
I’m
I agree it is nice as a photo on its own.
Patrick
On 2/23/2020 4:50 AM, Larry Colen wrote:
I’m working on my backlog (or would that be bok-lag?) of unprocessed photos and
found another group of bok choy shots.
Here’s one I originally took to show how I was doing something with the
lighting
I’m working on my backlog (or would that be bok-lag?) of unprocessed photos and
found another group of bok choy shots.
Here’s one I originally took to show how I was doing something with the
lighting (the filter box is a gobo), but I decided I rather like it as a photo:
The bw with the bok choy in the center is my choice -- and it would work
for next months PUG :_)
ann
On 2/21/2020 5:54 PM, Larry Colen wrote:
On Feb 21, 2020, at 2:27 PM, Rick Womer wrote:
Larry, I like these! 976 is my favorite, for its asymmetry and the delicate
green of the plant
> On Feb 21, 2020, at 2:27 PM, Rick Womer wrote:
>
> Larry, I like these! 976 is my favorite, for its asymmetry and the delicate
> green of the plant against the black fabric.
Thanks a bunch Rick.
>
> Rick
>
>> On Feb 18, 2020, at 12:18 AM, Larry Colen wrote:
>>
>> I got sidetracked
Larry, I like these! 976 is my favorite, for its asymmetry and the delicate
green of the plant against the black fabric.
Rick
> On Feb 18, 2020, at 12:18 AM, Larry Colen wrote:
>
> I got sidetracked while dinner was cooking. The good thing about playing
> with my food is that it keeps me
Now that I’m home and have a real computer rather than my phone.
> On Feb 19, 2020, at 10:29 AM, Stanley Halpin
> wrote:
>
> Of the set I prefer the original (not B) 19976.
Thanks.
>
> However, I am too analytical sometimes. When I see a quasi abstraction, I try
> to figure out what I am
It's the grid on a soft box for my flash
On February 19, 2020 10:29:43 AM PST, Stanley Halpin
wrote:
>Of the set I prefer the original (not B) 19976.
>
>However, I am too analytical sometimes. When I see a quasi abstraction,
>I try to figure out what I am looking at. And get lost in that quest,
Of the set I prefer the original (not B) 19976.
However, I am too analytical sometimes. When I see a quasi abstraction, I try
to figure out what I am looking at. And get lost in that quest, lose to an
extent the chance to take in the whole image.
So, in this case I get lost in trying to figure
I got sidetracked while dinner was cooking. The good thing about playing with
my food is that it keeps me from playing with other people’s food.
https://www.flickr.com/photos/ellarsee/49551426887
C appreciated. This one almost seems like a near miss, and I’m wondering if
it’s worth
2010/1/8 frank theriault knarftheria...@gmail.com:
Nice tilt. Blurry in all the right spots.
It's brilliant!
;-)
Okay, seriously, I really do like it. Conveys the hustle and bustle
of Chinatown without a single person in the frame. Very cool.
now that's a street shooter talking if
Been working on decisions for my PDML Book entries, not an easy task
(down to 7, getting outside opinions). I have to say, the pictures
from last year are outstanding and I can only hope in my wildest
dreams to be half as good as the work presented there.
As for the PESO...a visit to NYC
On Thu, Jan 7, 2010 at 4:14 PM, Ed Keeney ewkph...@gmail.com wrote:
Been working on decisions for my PDML Book entries, not an easy task
(down to 7, getting outside opinions). I have to say, the pictures
from last year are outstanding and I can only hope in my wildest
dreams to be half as
14 matches
Mail list logo
