"Paul" [EMAIL PROTECTED] asked:
Also I have read in magazines that the same effect can be acheived by =
taking the usual image then cropping top and bottom followed by an =
enlargement of the remaining elongated image. Is one way better than =
the other?
As others have pointed out, it's
Hi,
This is probably a really stupid question but it
has been playing on my mind for a while.
I have an MZ-5n which as most of you know has a
panoramic format. My question is how exactly does this work bearing in
mind the standard 35mm frame size. Does the image spread over two frames
or
Recently Paul wrote:
I have an MZ-5n which as most of you know has a panoramic format. My =
question is how exactly does this work bearing in mind the standard 35mm =
frame size. Does the image spread over two frames or is the effect =
created during the processing stage? =20
The top and
Date: Thu, 22 Mar 2001 21:50:21 +1100
From: "Paul" [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Panoramic Mode
"Hi,"
Hey Paul!
"This is probably a really stupid question but it has been playing on my =
mind for a while."
hehe.
"I have an MZ-5n which as most of you know has
Paul,
Not a stupid question at all, as panorama advantages are not
immediate. I like panorama format a lot and I prefer to do it in
camera as opposed to usual cropping because:
- for slides, I don't have to do the tedious work of mounting
additional masks together with the frame;
- for
Message -
From: Paul
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, March 22, 2001 2:50 AM
Subject: Panoramic Mode
Hi,
This is probably a really stupid question but it has been playing on my mind
for a while.
I have an MZ-5n which as most of you know has a panoramic format. My
question is how exactly
with the
ZX, but the PZ way really sucks because it is easy to miss and then you have
screwed up some perfectly good shots.
Bruce Dayton
Sacramento, CA
- Original Message -
From: "Cy Galley" [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, March 22, 2001 5:49 AM
Subject: Re:
7 matches
Mail list logo
