> george de fockert wrote:
>
> > Personally I think that it is not made by pentax,
> > I find the construction very 'unpentax'
> > - The aperture ring shows some backsides from screws.
> > - The stray light is prevented by some furry tube shifting in and out
with
> > the zooming translation
> >
Frank wrote:
> yep, the A 35-105 f3.5 changes length when zooming. The A 70-210 f4 does
> not.
Thanks. But does the lens extend annoyingly to its full length when you
point the camera down?
Nenad
-
This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List. To unsubscribe,
go to http://www.pdml.ne
> > The 35-200 is the only possibly rebadged 3rd party
> > A-lens that I am aware of (I don't know the 35-135
> > though).
>
> I have had the A35-210 in ma hands, and it seemed to be a genuine Pentax
> A-series lens. VERY similar in look and feel to the A70-210A.
>
> Cheers,
> Boz
>
Personally
>Another question: Looking at the photos on your site the A35-210 and
>A35-135 lenses appear to be 'one touch' zooms (one ring for zooming and
>focusing) but unlike the A70-210 would appear to change length while
>zooming. Is this correct?
yep, the A 35-105 f3.5 changes length when zooming. The
--- Nenad Djurdjevic <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I was just looking at the lens info and pictures on
> Boz's webpage and I
> noticed that the A35-135 3.5-4.5 lens appears to
> have the same "look" as the
> A35-210 3.5-4.5. Does this mean that it is also a
> rebadged Tokina? (I note
> that the 35
Nenad Djurdjevic wrote-
"Does anybody know anything about this lens? I think
it would be a very interesting lens to use and own.
Also where can I get one? I imagine that it's very
rare."
---
As far as I remember, the construction of this lens is
identical to
Does anybody know anything about this lens? I
think it would be a very interesting lens to use and own. Also where can I
get one? I imagine that it's very rare.
Nenad Djurdjevic
Perth, Western Australia
7 matches
Mail list logo
