ED]>
Sent: Thursday, November 06, 2003 11:29 AM
Subject: Re: Pentax *ist D vs. Fujifilm S2 Pro: same pictures in same
conditions
> Dario Bonazza 2 <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Sorry, all *ist D pictures were taken with default settings
> for sharpness,
> > contrast an
Rüdiger Neumann wrote:
> It is not obvious on your home page, what camera gives the more natural
> colors as the colors are very different, you should at that.
The *ist D is better balanced. That's evident in studio shots, and less
evident in outdoors, where the true colors were somewhere in betw
On Wed, 5 Nov 2003, [iso-8859-1] Rüdiger Neumann wrote:
> You complain at the results with the RAW files. At a german user forum
> somebody has done a test with the Pentax Photo Lab and GENZO, a free RAW
> format converter.
> Here you can see the results in form ot two different pictures:
> http://
Hallo Dario,
you have done a good job on *istD to S2 comparision.
It is not obvious on your home page, what camera gives the more natural
colors as the colors are very different, you should at that. It would be
also nice, if you can inform about the sharpness, contrast and color setings
on the *ist
Hello Rüdiger,
You wrote:
> Have you also compared the AF of the MZ-S with the *istD.
About fast-moving subjects, maybe the MZ-S can get one extra shot during the
same time (say 6 frames while the *ist D takes 5).
> Somebody on a
> German userforum reported, that the low light abillity is bette
Hi,
Jostein wrote:
> I have been out shooting some autumn landscapes today, with plenty of
> vegetation detail. All my images are in PEF, so I will definately look for
> sawteeth. I shot most of my images with the FA*28-70/2.8, btw.
That is such a good walking about lens, despite its size. I mu
6 matches
Mail list logo
