On Friday, October 26, 2001, at 02:37 AM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
> If you compare the dimensions of the two, for the 645 and 67, they are
> pretty
> similar. But the ED-IF will definitely be sharper (unless you mean the
> ED-IF
> for the 67).
Yeah, I'm looking at buying the 300mm f4 ED IF
On Wednesday, October 24, 2001, at 12:58 PM, tom wrote:
> BTW, what's the best film for taking pictures of various things?
Kodak, because Fuji film is too green and Agfa film is too orange. The
yellow and red of the Kodak film is just right.
-Aaron
-
This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Ma
I agree the 67 is slow and fat, especially with a
300mm F4 ( or Aaron ) stuck to it, but if it did catch
a 645n or any other camera for that matter it would
definitly kick A$$ :)
--- tom <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Aaron Reynolds wrote:
> >
> > On Tuesday, October 23, 2001, at 03:24 PM, Ryan
On Wednesday, October 24, 2001, at 12:25 PM, tom wrote:
>
> The 67 is too fat and slow to catch a 645n in order to kick it's ass...
Slow and fat, eh? Beware of men brandishing 67s and wearing Team Canada
hockey jerseys, Tom, cuz I forsee a beating in your future. ;)
-Aaron
-
This message is f
tom wrote:
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> > [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
> > > > PM, Ryan Charron wrote:
> > > >
> > > > > It just does, that's all there is to it!
> > > > >
> > > > > No Canon or Nikon even comes close.
> > > >
> > > > While I agree about the 645n's superiority over every devic
tom wrote:
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> > [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
> > > > PM, Ryan Charron wrote:
> > > >
> > > > > It just does, that's all there is to it!
> > > > >
> > > > > No Canon or Nikon even comes close.
> > > >
> > > > While I agree about the 645n's superiority over every devic
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
> In a message dated 10/24/2001 8:32:56 AM US Eastern Standard Time,
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
>
> > > On Tuesday, October 23, 2001, at 03:24 PM, Ryan Charron wrote:
> > >
> > > > It just does, that's all there is to it!
> > > >
> > > > No Canon or Nikon even co
In a message dated 10/24/2001 8:32:56 AM US Eastern Standard Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
> > On Tuesday, October 23, 2001, at 03:24 PM, Ryan Charron wrote:
> >
> > > It just does, that's all there is to it!
> > >
> > > No Canon or Nikon even comes close.
> >
> > While I agree about
Aaron Reynolds wrote:
>
> On Tuesday, October 23, 2001, at 03:24 PM, Ryan Charron wrote:
>
> > It just does, that's all there is to it!
> >
> > No Canon or Nikon even comes close.
>
> While I agree about the 645n's superiority over every device made by
> Canon and Nikon, I must respectfully vo
On Tuesday, October 23, 2001, at 03:24 PM, Ryan Charron wrote:
> It just does, that's all there is to it!
>
> No Canon or Nikon even comes close.
While I agree about the 645n's superiority over every device made by
Canon and Nikon, I must respectfully voice the opinion that THE PENTAX
67 KICK
It just does, that's all there is to it!
No Canon or Nikon even comes close.
Ryan
Make a great connection at Yahoo! Personals.
http://personals.yahoo.com
-
This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List. To unsubscribe,
go to http://www.pdml.net and follow the directions. Don't forget to
v
11 matches
Mail list logo