On Thu, 5 Oct 2006, Godfrey DiGiorgi wrote:
On Oct 5, 2006, at 11:56 AM, Kostas Kavoussanakis wrote:
I have no idea where a credible source for MTF data on the DA14/2.8
might be. I'm commenting based on what I see from examining 800-1000
photographs made with it.
I assumed the DS has an
Kostas Kavoussanakis wrote:
On Thu, 5 Oct 2006, Godfrey DiGiorgi wrote:
On Oct 5, 2006, at 11:56 AM, Kostas Kavoussanakis wrote:
I have no idea where a credible source for MTF data on the DA14/2.8
might be. I'm commenting based on what I see from examining 800-1000
photographs made with
Indeed AFAIR the DS/DL/K100 only have the normal program preset.
D users (as Z1(p) and probably MZ-S) can choose for MTF, speed, depth
or normal and set by custom fuction.
2006/10/6, Adam Maas [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Kostas Kavoussanakis wrote:
On Thu, 5 Oct 2006, Godfrey DiGiorgi wrote:
On Oct
It's always been a question mark to me whether the MTF line was used
in any of the DS' Program or Program-presets. Not that I use any of
the Program modes much anyway ... I think my camera has been used
only on Av and M modes this entire trip so far.
Godfrey
On Oct 6, 2006, at 3:28 PM,
It's always been a question mark to me whether the MTF line was used
in any of the DS' Program or Program-presets. Not that I use any of
the Program modes much anyway ... I think my camera has been used
only on Av and M modes this entire trip so far.
I only just recently discovered the
On Thu, 5 Oct 2006, Godfrey DiGiorgi wrote:
The DA14 reaches its peak performance between f/4.5 and f/5.6 in my
experience, but it's quite good even wide open (as you can see from
the examples).
Would you know what the MTF data favour for that lens?
Kostas
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
On Oct 5, 2006, at 10:53 AM, Kostas Kavoussanakis wrote:
On Thu, 5 Oct 2006, Godfrey DiGiorgi wrote:
The DA14 reaches its peak performance between f/4.5 and f/5.6 in my
experience, but it's quite good even wide open (as you can see from
the examples).
Would you know what the MTF data
On Thu, 5 Oct 2006, Godfrey DiGiorgi wrote:
I have no idea where a credible source for MTF data on the DA14/2.8
might be. I'm commenting based on what I see from examining 800-1000
photographs made with it.
Hi Godfrey,
I assumed the DS has an MTF program-line; if it's true, a QD test
could
On Oct 5, 2006, at 11:56 AM, Kostas Kavoussanakis wrote:
I have no idea where a credible source for MTF data on the DA14/2.8
might be. I'm commenting based on what I see from examining 800-1000
photographs made with it.
I assumed the DS has an MTF program-line; if it's true, a QD test
Kostas Kavoussanakis wrote:
On Thu, 5 Oct 2006, Godfrey DiGiorgi wrote:
I have no idea where a credible source for MTF data on the DA14/2.8
might be. I'm commenting based on what I see from examining 800-1000
photographs made with it.
Hi Godfrey,
I assumed the DS has an MTF
Any experience with this lens? A good one?
I'm planning to buy the DA* 16-50/2.8 lens for the K10D in due course.
However, I need something wider as well and Pentax doesn't offer a prime
lens that is wider than 16mm except for the 14/2.8 which is too close to the
16mm to make much sense. Hence,
Pål Jensen wrote:
Any experience with this lens? A good one?
I'm planning to buy the DA* 16-50/2.8 lens for the K10D in due course.
However, I need something wider as well and Pentax doesn't offer a prime
lens that is wider than 16mm except for the 14/2.8 which is too close to the
16mm to
Here's a shot with the 12-24 at 12mm on the *istD. No perspective correction.
The only PhotoShop adjustment was a curves adjustment to darken the sky.
http://www.photo.net/photodb/photo?photo_id=4895914size=lg
Paul
-- Original message --
From: Pål Jensen [EMAIL
The DA 12-24 is quite excellent. I've used it for a wide variety of shots and
have been impressed with its corner sharpness and minimal barrel distortion.
-- Original message --
From: Adam Maas [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Pål Jensen wrote:
Any experience with this lens?
On Oct 4, 2006, at 6:56 PM, Adam Maas wrote:
Any experience with this lens? A good one?
I'm planning to buy the DA* 16-50/2.8 lens for the K10D in due
course.
However, I need something wider as well and Pentax doesn't offer a
prime
lens that is wider than 16mm except for the 14/2.8
I can't say for sure if the DA 14/2.8 is sharper than the DA 12-24,
although I expect it would be, at least at f4. However, based on
images I've seen, I think the DA 12-24 is better corrected. It seems
to have a bit less barrel distortion. But again, that's based on
inconclusive evidence.
You're quite right in that I haven't seen any direct comparisons on
the same subject matter between the two lenses. But looking at the
pictures you've showed and comparing them with my DA14 examples (and
others), I see less rectilinear distortion in the DA14.
Here's my oft-posted page of
Nice pics, but hard to compare distortion based on these and my pics.
Perhaps I'll make it out there some day, and we can get together and
shoot a brick wall:-)
Paul
On Oct 4, 2006, at 7:30 PM, Godfrey DiGiorgi wrote:
You're quite right in that I haven't seen any direct comparisons on
the
I agree. Come on out when next I hang a show and we'll spend quality
time with a brick wall...
;-)
Godfrey
On Oct 5, 2006, at 1:09 AM, Paul Stenquist wrote:
Nice pics, but hard to compare distortion based on these and my pics.
Perhaps I'll make it out there some day, and we can get
19 matches
Mail list logo
