Adam Maas schrieb:
> Pancho Hasselbach wrote:
>> Hi Mike,
>>
>> that sounds weird, but maybe the problem is another.
>>
>> I never experienced any banding, or other artifacts, whenever I shot
>> greycards, or other even grey subjects, on 1600 ISO B&W film,
>> underexposed by several stops. Same w
I'am more annoyed by the very childsish way Phil Askey is driving the
site/forum.
Very stupid and unprofessional.
Maybe that's why there are more and more idiots there ?
Thibault Massart aka Thibouille
--
*ist-D,Z1,SuperA,KX,MX, P30t and KR-10x ;) ...
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss
--- Cotty <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> confessed:
>
> >"Do not read email lists while intoxicated"
>
> Problem. I don't think I've ever read one sober.
>
> --
>
Now =that= explains many, many things...
Rick
http://www.photo.net/photos/RickW
_
On 29/11/06, Charles Robinson, discombobulated, unleashed:
>"Do not read email lists while intoxicated"
Problem. I don't think I've ever read one sober.
--
Cheers,
Cotty
___/\__
|| (O) | People, Places, Pastiche
||=|http://www.cottysnaps.com
_
Behalf Of Mark
Roberts
Sent: 29. november 2006 13:25
To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List
Subject: Re: Pentax DPReview forum
Then again, therre are a few of them with a sense of proportion (and a
sense of humor):
http://forums.dpreview.com/forums/read.asp?forum=1036&message=21064848
--
PDML Pentax
: jensbladt248
-Oprindelig meddelelse-
Fra: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] vegne af Charles
Robinson
Sendt: 29. november 2006 20:47
Til: Pentax-Discuss Mail List
Emne: Re: Pentax DPReview forum
On Nov 29, 2006, at 10:37, Mark Roberts wrote:
> ...but then I read this:
>
On Nov 29, 2006, at 10:37, Mark Roberts wrote:
> ...but then I read this:
> http://forums.dpreview.com/forums/read.asp?forum=1036&message=21061260
> Clearly the work of a mind that is not merely twisted, but actually
> sprained.
>
Heh.
I think people get a little too wound up about things, and th
Pancho Hasselbach wrote:
> Hi Mike,
>
> that sounds weird, but maybe the problem is another.
>
> I never experienced any banding, or other artifacts, whenever I shot
> greycards, or other even grey subjects, on 1600 ISO B&W film,
> underexposed by several stops. Same when pushing HP5+ to 1600 I
Hi Mike,
that sounds weird, but maybe the problem is another.
I never experienced any banding, or other artifacts, whenever I shot
greycards, or other even grey subjects, on 1600 ISO B&W film,
underexposed by several stops. Same when pushing HP5+ to 1600 ISO.
Thorough development leads to a ve
Some people like to look for trouble..
Mike Hamilton wrote:
> Sometimes (and with increasing frequency), I wonder why I bother
> reading the Pentax forum at DPReview. Here's a gem from today,
> addressed to Ned Bunnel, Marketing VP for Pentax USA (Edited for
> brevity):
>
> ---
> "I shoot
Charles Robinson wrote:
>On Nov 29, 2006, at 6:24, Mark Roberts wrote:
>
>> Then again, therre are a few of them with a sense of proportion (and a
>> sense of humor):
>> http://forums.dpreview.com/forums/read.asp?forum=1036&message=21064848
>>
>I did enjoy this one.
>
>And I still find useful info
Bruce Dayton wrote:
> That is pretty much why I quit a long time ago. I'm not sure there
> are any photographers left over there. I periodically go back and
> read a bit and then have to walk away again. It is not just the
> Pentax users, either.
>
No it isn't. I gave up on the DPReview forum
On Nov 29, 2006, at 6:24, Mark Roberts wrote:
> Then again, therre are a few of them with a sense of proportion (and a
> sense of humor):
> http://forums.dpreview.com/forums/read.asp?forum=1036&message=21064848
>
I did enjoy this one.
And I still find useful information from time to time on the
Mike Hamilton wrote:
>Sometimes (and with increasing frequency), I wonder why I bother
>reading the Pentax forum at DPReview. Here's a gem from today
HAR! Yes, some of the DPReview characters make the PDML's "sky is
falling" brigade look tame by comparison!
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
Then again, therre are a few of them with a sense of proportion (and a
sense of humor):
http://forums.dpreview.com/forums/read.asp?forum=1036&message=21064848
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
At 02:19 PM 29/11/2006, Lawrence Kwan wrote:
>He totally lost his cool, declared that he would
>place K10D last in line for review because of all the moaning, and ended
>up banning the original poster and removing the thread.
That's what you get for pissing off the guy who owns the bat & ball.
On Tue, 28 Nov 2006, Mike Hamilton wrote:
> Shocking. Who would think that a camera would produce ugly noise when
> underexposed 2 stops at ISO 1600? Even more shocking that this user
> would care, given his first statement that he uses the camera in the
> range of 100-400.
Even more ridiculous
Hey, don't be critical of this kind of experimentation! Some day you
may want to take a photo of a relatively even toned grey subject at an
effective ISO of 6400, and then you'll remember this adventurous soul
(who probably needs to get a life) and you'll realize that you
shouldn't use more tha
That is pretty much why I quit a long time ago. I'm not sure there
are any photographers left over there. I periodically go back and
read a bit and then have to walk away again. It is not just the
Pentax users, either.
--
Bruce
Tuesday, November 28, 2006, 8:57:21 PM, you wrote:
MH> Sometime
Sometimes (and with increasing frequency), I wonder why I bother
reading the Pentax forum at DPReview. Here's a gem from today,
addressed to Ned Bunnel, Marketing VP for Pentax USA (Edited for
brevity):
---
"I shoot in the ISO range of 100 to 400, and I have found the color
and tonal pale
20 matches
Mail list logo
