Hi
I do believe I need to clarify something first. I born without thumbs
and this does influence how I look at and use things. I bought my first
SLR - a ME Super because it was the smallest SLR at the time and worked
best for me. The 2 button interface which many don't like I actually
I don't think that the style of the Df influenced the style of the KP as
much as the questions of how do we make the camera appear smaller, (ah
shave of a couple of mm from the right top plate, and the grip.
Hum, well now where do we put that pesky front wheel? Ah vertically on
the front
I don't think Ricoh mistakes the Df for a sales leader either.
But, if you compare the "style" of the KP in relation to the rest of the
Pentax line of DSLRs and then compare the "style" of the Df in relation
to the rest of Nikon's line-up, I think there are some similarities.
On 1/26/2017 12:32
Looking at the top plates of both cameras dispels all illusions. The
Pentax isn't a retro design aping an old film camera, it's a digital
camera with one design touch from the film era. The Nikon is a serial
killer wearing the skin suit of a victim...
On 1/26/2017 11:38 AM, John wrote:
On
I don't think so, the only thing retro about the KP is the shape of the
"pentaprism" housing, and that's not particularly retro based on
physics. I doubt even Ricoh, (ex Pentax), marketing could mistake the
Nikon Df as a top sales leader.
On 1/26/2017 11:38 AM, John wrote:
On 1/25/2017
On 1/25/2017 8:18 PM, P. J. Alling wrote:
There is no meaningful size difference between a KP and K-5.
http://camerasize.com/compare/#706,187
Ditto the KP and K-3 just in case anyone cared...
http://camerasize.com/compare/#706,485
I think this may be the more meaningful comparison:
There is no meaningful size difference between a KP and K-5.
http://camerasize.com/compare/#706,187
Ditto the KP and K-3 just in case anyone cared...
http://camerasize.com/compare/#706,485
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to
7 matches
Mail list logo
