Sorry bout that, but I'm just a tease.
But I AM greateful. You saved my day.
Tim Typo
Mostly Harmless
- Original Message -
From: "Bob W" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "'Pentax-Discuss Mail List'"
Sent: Friday, June 08, 2007 9:50 PM
Subject: RE: Pe
rom: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
> Behalf Of Tim Øsleby
> Sent: 08 June 2007 18:02
> To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List
> Subject: Re: Pentax Photo Gallery Response
>
> I'd better stop there.
> Somebody might take me seriously.
>
> Just for the record:
> I
ike wilson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Pentax-Discuss Mail List"
Sent: Friday, June 08, 2007 3:05 PM
Subject: Re: Pentax Photo Gallery Response
>
> From: Tim Øsleby <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Date: 2007/06/08 Fri PM 12:09:42 GMT
> To: "Pentax-Discuss Ma
On Jun 8, 2007, at 6:05 AM, mike wilson wrote:
>
>>
>> From: Tim Øsleby <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>> Date: 2007/06/08 Fri PM 12:09:42 GMT
>> To: "Pentax-Discuss Mail List"
>> Subject: Re: Pentax Photo Gallery Response
>>
>> Who said horny?
>
> From: Tim Øsleby <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Date: 2007/06/08 Fri PM 12:09:42 GMT
> To: "Pentax-Discuss Mail List"
> Subject: Re: Pentax Photo Gallery Response
>
> Who said horny?
> I was expressing a deaper, more mature, non physical love ;-)
What
: RE: Pentax Photo Gallery Response
>
>>
>> From: Jack Davis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>> Date: 2007/06/05 Tue PM 10:46:03 GMT
>> To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List
>> Subject: RE: Pentax Photo Gallery Response
>>
>>
>> --- Tom C <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
> From: Jack Davis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Date: 2007/06/05 Tue PM 10:46:03 GMT
> To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List
> Subject: RE: Pentax Photo Gallery Response
>
>
> --- Tom C <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > > > Subject: Re: Pentax Photo
--- Tom C <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > Subject: Re: Pentax Photo Gallery Response
> > >
> > > On 5/6/07, David J Brooks, discombobulated, unleashed:
> > >
> > > >Only a few have their harthats on waiting for the sky to
> > >
> > Subject: Re: Pentax Photo Gallery Response
> >
> > On 5/6/07, David J Brooks, discombobulated, unleashed:
> >
> > >Only a few have their harthats on waiting for the sky to
> > >fall.
> >
> > A few more have their harts in their mouths
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
> Behalf Of Cotty
> Sent: 05 June 2007 22:04
> To: pentax list
> Subject: Re: Pentax Photo Gallery Response
>
> On 5/6/07, David J Brooks, discombobulated, unleashed:
>
> >
On 5/6/07, David J Brooks, discombobulated, unleashed:
>Only a few have their harthats on waiting for the sky to
>fall.
A few more have their harts in their mouths ;-))
--
Cheers,
Cotty
___/\__
|| (O) | People, Places, Pastiche
||=|http://www.cottysnaps.com
__
John
>
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Jack Davis [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Monday, June 04, 2007 2:14 PM
> To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List
> Subject: RE: Pentax Photo Gallery Response
>
> Thanks, John. Actually, you may have even noticed yourself that there
> ha
rom: Jack Davis [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Monday, June 04, 2007 2:14 PM
> To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List
> Subject: RE: Pentax Photo Gallery Response
>
> Thanks, John. Actually, you may have even noticed yourself that there
> has been a bit of speculation about why it now seems
That's EXACTLY what he would say if there REALLY WAS a conspiracy. :-)
Tom C.
> >
> > We do check in on the forums from time to time, and to be honest,
> > some
> > of the speculation, rumors and conspiracy theories give a pretty good
> > chuckle.
> >
> > Thanks,
> >
> > John
> >
--
PDML Pent
sacrifices:).
Thanks for your support.
John
-Original Message-
From: Jack Davis [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, June 04, 2007 2:14 PM
To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List
Subject: RE: Pentax Photo Gallery Response
Thanks, John. Actually, you may have even noticed yourself that there
has
ohn
>
>
> -Original Message-
> From: AlunFoto [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Monday, June 04, 2007 1:08 PM
> To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List
> Subject: Re: Pentax Photo Gallery Response
>
> I agree, Jack.
>
> Here's a quote from the FAQ:
>
>
Thanks for responding here, John. Much appreciated.
Jostein
--
http://www.alunfoto.no
http://alunfoto.blogspot.com
2007/6/4, Carlson, John___PAIC_SO <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> I typical art gallery can sometimes take months to consider a piece for
> inclusion. With that in mind, the Photo Gallery
> > >From: Jack Davis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > >Reply-To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List
> > >To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List
> > >Subject: Pentax Photo Gallery Response
> > >Date: Mon, 4 Jun 2007 10:40:02 -0700 (PDT)
> > >
> > >I asked the obv
; > fine,
> > no anticipated changes here, though apparently attention has been
> > diverted.
> >
> > That may well be the case. I would guess the gallery was never
> > anyone's
> > fulll time job.
> >
> > Tom C.
> >
> >
> >
ntion has been
> diverted.
>
> That may well be the case. I would guess the gallery was never
> anyone's
> fulll time job.
>
> Tom C.
>
>
> >From: Jack Davis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> >Reply-To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List
> >To: Pentax-Discuss
IL PROTECTED]>
>Reply-To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List
>To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List
>Subject: Pentax Photo Gallery Response
>Date: Mon, 4 Jun 2007 10:40:02 -0700 (PDT)
>
>I asked the obvious question of Pentax and received the following
>response:
>
>Jack,
>
>I ca
I asked the obvious question of Pentax and received the following
response:
Jack,
I can assure you that the delay in images accepted or on hold as
nothing to do with Pentax and Hoya activities in Japan. It is business
as usual for us here in the US and we do not anticipate any changes.
The judge
22 matches
Mail list logo
