https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DGscoaUWW2M
On 2/5/2015 1:08 PM, P.J. Alling wrote:
It's The Guardian what do you expect. Hack writing, thought admittedly
better hack writing that the average US paper.
On 2/4/2015 11:25 AM, Igor PDML-StR wrote:
Here is an article in The Guardian:
http://www.
Sturgeon was a wise man, who produced a number of Gem like stories, and
quite a bit of crap himself, which he would probably readily admit.
After all, he was paid per word, and a man's got to eat.
On 2/4/2015 3:44 PM, Mark Roberts wrote:
Ken Waller wrote:
In a world of pretentious and compl
It's The Guardian what do you expect. Hack writing, thought admittedly
better hack writing that the average US paper.
On 2/4/2015 11:25 AM, Igor PDML-StR wrote:
Here is an article in The Guardian:
http://www.theguardian.com/artanddesign/jonathanjonesblog/2015/feb/03/instagram-generation-amateu
On Wed, Feb 04, 2015 at 01:44:02PM -0500, Bruce Walker wrote:
> Check the byline: it's just Jonathan Jones finger painting in his
> mashed potatoes again.
Yep - Jonathan Jones is paid to stir up controversy, not to serve information.
45 years ago I used to trust the Guardian. Not today, though.
He's full of stinky brown stuff.
MARK !
haven't seen many of these lately
Kenneth Waller
http://www.pentaxphotogallery.com/kennethwaller
- Original Message -
From: "John"
Subject: Re: Photography, art, unintentional plagiarism, ...
On 2/4/2015 11:25 AM,
Ken Waller wrote:
>>In a world of pretentious and complacent amateur snapping, we are drowning
>>those moments of truth in an >ocean of the banal.
>
>Agreed!
Well duh! Sturgeon's Law ("90% of everything is crap"). Why should it
not apply to photography?
--
Mark Roberts - Photography & Multime
On 2/4/2015 11:25 AM, Igor PDML-StR wrote:
Here is an article in The Guardian:
http://www.theguardian.com/artanddesign/jonathanjonesblog/2015/feb/03/instagram-generation-amateur-photographers-art-plagiarism
While the article raises some interesting questions, I disagree with
some of the statem
Check the byline: it's just Jonathan Jones finger painting in his
mashed potatoes again.
Two word substitutions work here:
"The truth is that words like creativity, individuality, talent and
originality don’t readily apply when you have a planet of people all
writing articles."
For a good rebut
On 2015-02-04 9:25 , Igor PDML-StR wrote:
While the article raises some interesting questions, I disagree with some of
the statements the author makes. E.g. he suggests that you cannot "take
really great pictures" on a cruise. And that's because more than one person
can take similar pictures ther
Kenneth Waller
http://www.pentaxphotogallery.com/kennethwaller
- Original Message -----
From: "Igor PDML-StR"
Subject: Photography, art, unintentional plagiarism, ...
Here is an article in The Guardian:
http://www.theguardian.com/artanddesign/jonathanjonesblog/2015/feb/0
The writer of the article shows his own biases in the following statement:
"Photography can easily degenerate into a pseudo-art, with millions of
people all taking pictures of the same things and all thinking we are
special.
This amateur delusion of photographic art is everywhere today – from
Ins
Malcolm,
While starting reading this sentence below, I first thought it would be
something like:
"You could put two photographers in an empty garden shed,
and they would come back with three different images"
... each!
;-)
Cheers!
Igor
Malcolm Smith Wed, 04 Feb 2015 08:40:32 -0800 wrote
Igor wrote:
> Here is an article in The Guardian:
> http://www.theguardian.com/artanddesign/jonathanjonesblog/2015/feb/03/i
> nstagram-generation-amateur-photographers-art-plagiarism
>
> While the article raises some interesting questions, I disagree with
> some of the statements the author make
Here is an article in The Guardian:
http://www.theguardian.com/artanddesign/jonathanjonesblog/2015/feb/03/instagram-generation-amateur-photographers-art-plagiarism
While the article raises some interesting questions, I disagree with
some of the statements the author makes. E.g. he suggests that
14 matches
Mail list logo
