So far my snark at Ricewhine stands. I wish I could say it makes me
feel good but I had really hoped for a 24mp APS-C DSLR, a FF was just to
much to hope for.
--
Don't lose heart, they might want to cut it out, and they'll want to avoid a
lengthly search.
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
I'm with you there. A jump in rez of that amount would be welcome, and
would continue to justify my investment in only DA and DA* lenses.
Anyways, so far my K20D isn't stopping me from just shutting up and
shooting. :-)
On Wed, Sep 19, 2012 at 1:08 PM, P. J. Alling
webstertwenty...@gmail.com
A 24MP APS-C without AA-filter would have been nice.
DagT
Den 19. sep. 2012 kl. 20:03 skrev Bruce Walker:
I'm with you there. A jump in rez of that amount would be welcome, and
would continue to justify my investment in only DA and DA* lenses.
Anyways, so far my K20D isn't stopping me from
But improved autofocus will be even nicer. If it's truly a step up, the K5 IIs
will take the lead spot ahead of my K5, and the current backup, a K7, will go
on ebay.
Paul
On Sep 19, 2012, at 2:11 PM, DagT li...@thrane.name wrote:
A 24MP APS-C without AA-filter would have been nice.
DagT
On Sep 19, 2012, at 11:17 AM, Paul Stenquist wrote:
But improved autofocus will be even nicer. If it's truly a step up, the K5
IIs will take the lead spot ahead of my K5, and the current backup, a K7,
will go on ebay.
I recognize that I tend to take photos in conditions that are a bit
On Wed, Sep 19, 2012 at 12:31:43PM -0700, Larry Colen wrote:
Beyond that, faster accurate focus in stupid low light would really help.
From some of the reports I've seen, this is one area where the K-5 II has
significant improvements.
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
On Sep 19, 2012, at 3:31 PM, Larry Colen l...@red4est.com wrote:
On Sep 19, 2012, at 11:17 AM, Paul Stenquist wrote:
But improved autofocus will be even nicer. If it's truly a step up, the K5
IIs will take the lead spot ahead of my K5, and the current backup, a K7,
will go on ebay.
On Wed, Sep 19, 2012 at 3:52 PM, Paul Stenquist pnstenqu...@comcast.net wrote:
On Sep 19, 2012, at 3:31 PM, Larry Colen l...@red4est.com wrote:
One feature that would really help me would be different exposure metering
modes, one where I could say to not meter on the bright back lighting,
Paul and Bruce have given great advice. You also might find it
helpful to de-couple focus from the shutter button and use the back
focus button. Once you focus on something, the camera will stay
focused at that distance, eliminating the camera's need to re-focus
every time you touch the shutter
Wed Sep 19 15:31:43 EDT 2012
Larry Colen wrote:
Beyond that, faster accurate focus in stupid low light would really
help. Dancers just are not considerate enough to only move
perpendicular to the line of focus.
I feel for you Larry!
Those damn dancers! Shoot them! ;-)
Igor
--
PDML
Larry Colen lrc at red4est.com
Wed Sep 19 15:31:43 EDT 2012
On Sep 19, 2012, at 11:17 AM, Paul Stenquist wrote:
But improved autofocus will be even nicer. If it's truly a step up,
the K5 IIs will take the lead spot ahead of my K5, and the current
backup, a K7, will go on ebay.
I
On Sep 19, 2012, at 12:52 PM, Paul Stenquist wrote:
On Sep 19, 2012, at 3:31 PM, Larry Colen l...@red4est.com wrote:
On Sep 19, 2012, at 11:17 AM, Paul Stenquist wrote:
But improved autofocus will be even nicer. If it's truly a step up, the K5
IIs will take the lead spot ahead of my
On Sep 19, 2012, at 1:40 PM, Igor Roshchin wrote:
Larry Colen lrc at red4est.com
Wed Sep 19 15:31:43 EDT 2012
On Sep 19, 2012, at 11:17 AM, Paul Stenquist wrote:
Often suggested technique to deal with those cases is to set the AF to
use the central point. That can be done for centered
13 matches
Mail list logo
