Re: Pop Photo reviews the film *ist

2003-09-25 Thread Johan Uiterwijk Winkel
Brendan wrote: Doesn't it have flash confirmation? the lil flash thing blinks alot to confirm it worked? right? I don't know. To save batteries and have a more powerfull flash i've never used the build in one. The external has got a flash conformation. But let's take a look at the manual. Nop

Re: Pop Photo reviews the film *ist

2003-09-25 Thread Alin Flaider
Bill wrote: BO> The latest issue arrived yesterday with a very thorough review of the film BO> *ist. According to them, it's a very nice camera for the money. The key word is indeed "for the money". To quote a friend: "I peeked at the corners of the viewfinder and there it was a jumbel of

Re: Pop Photo reviews the film *ist

2003-09-25 Thread Sylwester Pietrzyk
on 25.09.03 1:01, Bill Owens at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > The latest issue arrived yesterday with a very thorough review of the film > *ist. According to them, it's a very nice camera for the money. Biggest > gripe was no flash confirmation. Maybe there was no flash confirmation with built-in f

Re: Pop Photo reviews the film *ist

2003-09-24 Thread Brendan
Doesn't it have flash confirmation? the lil flash thing blinks alot to confirm it worked? right? --- Johan Uiterwijk Winkel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Bill Owens wrote: > > >The latest issue arrived yesterday with a very > thorough review of the film > >*ist. According to them, it's a very ni

Re: Pop Photo reviews the film *ist

2003-09-24 Thread Johan Uiterwijk Winkel
Bill Owens wrote: The latest issue arrived yesterday with a very thorough review of the film *ist. According to them, it's a very nice camera for the money. Biggest gripe was no flash confirmation. Bill Has anybody scanned this article, I would be glad to read it . Johan Uiterwijk Winkel.