One thing I noticed about the Pentax Photo Lab software is that it took care of
hot pixels in a 3200 ISO image in a way that none of the other programs I tried
out did, without using a noise filter. Does the camera "know" where its
weakest pixels are and somehow convey that information to the s
Hi Aaron,
Do you have PSCS 1? It's just about as good as version 2. I have one at
home, two at work. Version two adds some nice tweaks, but the results
are pretty much the same. The upsizing from conversion is very good in
both. You have to dodge and burn post conversion. But you can of course
On Jun 26, 2006, at 11:36 PM, Paul Stenquist wrote:
> Do you have PSCS 1? It's just about as good as version 2
Nope, running Photoshop 7 still. When you have and need three
licenses, you delay as long as humanly possible when upgrading.
-Aaron
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
In terms of a RAW Converter, I think you'd be better off with PS
Elements 3 or 4.
On Jun 26, 2006, at 11:48 PM, Aaron Reynolds wrote:
>
> On Jun 26, 2006, at 11:36 PM, Paul Stenquist wrote:
>
>> Do you have PSCS 1? It's just about as good as version 2
>
> Nope, running Photoshop 7 still. When yo
For what reason, Paul?
-Aaron
On Jun 27, 2006, at 6:13 AM, Paul Stenquist wrote:
> In terms of a RAW Converter, I think you'd be better off with PS
> Elements 3 or 4.
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
> -Original Message-
>
> From: Godfrey DiGiorgi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Subj: Re: Windoze versions and DS
> Date: Mon Jun 26, 2006 9:56 am
> Size: 399 bytes
> To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List
>
>
> On Jun 26, 2006, at 5:59 AM, mike wilson wrote:
>
I meant only in comparison to using the plug-in converter with PhotoShop 7.
The software Godfrey suggested and other alternatives might be better. But the
RAW Converter for Elements is reportedly quite close in capability to the
version used with PSCS.
Paul
-- Original message ---
ACR 3.x works with them. It's probably the best quality RAW conversion
for PEF's. You lose the advanced controls though.
-Adam
Aaron Reynolds wrote:
> For what reason, Paul?
>
> -Aaron
>
> On Jun 27, 2006, at 6:13 AM, Paul Stenquist wrote:
>
>
>>In terms of a RAW Converter, I think you'd be
Not sure what Paul will say Aaron, but I have El 3 and loaded up the new ACR to
work with
D200
Nefs. Its a cheaper program, about $100.00 or less and you can do raw
conversions with
some
limitations. The main stuff is there, but you don't have the lens adjustment
parts.
I don't really care fo
On 27.06.2006, at 16:06 , Adam Maas wrote:
> ACR 3.x works with them. It's probably the best quality RAW conversion
> for PEF's. You lose the advanced controls though.
Unfortunately ACR as well as Lightroom have problems with some red
hues in PEF files :-( Silkypix or Aperture are much better in
10 matches
Mail list logo
