RE: (Was: Fairy pics) (sexual innuendo removed)

2001-04-12 Thread Len Paris
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of > Tom Rittenhouse > Sent: Thursday, April 12, 2001 4:50 PM > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: Re: (Was: Fairy pics) (sexual innuendo removed) > > > You are right her work is only worth what people are > willi

Re: (Was: Fairy pics) (sexual innuendo removed)

2001-04-12 Thread Tom Rittenhouse
You are right her work is only worth what people are willing to pay for it. However comparing her work to Sears and JC Penny's is what we are advising her not to do. Respect is very important in how the public views your work. You are aware, are you not, that most of us telling her not to low

Re: (Was: Fairy pics) (sexual innuendo removed)

2001-04-12 Thread Norman Baugher
Now that's good advice. Norm "Paris, Leonard" wrote: > Norm, > > What she is worth is what the customers are willing to pay for her work, not > what she (or we, for that matter) think that she is worth. > > There are lots of child photography studios with web sites that have prices. > There are

RE: (Was: Fairy pics) (sexual innuendo removed)

2001-04-12 Thread Paris, Leonard
Norm, What she is worth is what the customers are willing to pay for her work, not what she (or we, for that matter) think that she is worth. There are lots of child photography studios with web sites that have prices. There are also lots of stores, like Sears and JC Penney, that do child portra