On 9 Jun 2004 at 14:32, Collin Brendemuehl wrote:
> Anyone here ever consider the images from these lenses to be "harsh"? (A
> description given by someone on rec.photo.equipment.35mm)
Only accurate, if the shooter was used to the output of crap zooms then I guess
that could be their perceptio
- Original Message -
From: "Collin Brendemuehl"
Subject: 31/77 Harsh?
> Anyone here ever consider the images from these lenses to be
"harsh"? (A description given by someone on
rec.photo.equipment.35mm)
They are both certainly amoung the sharper, contrastier lenses I ave
owned.
I don'
Wide opened, the 77 beats my 85/1.8D, and overall the 77 has more '3D'
look than the Nikon. So the 77 is harsh for portrait, but superb in
general.
Andy Chang took me to a Pentax store in Taipei (thanks Andy!!!) and I
got a 50/1.4 FA. After some testing, I must say this is one sharp lens
(just lik
You are very welcome Winston!
Andy
> -Original Message-
> From: Winston [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Thursday, June 10, 2004 10:02 AM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: RE: 31/77 Harsh?
>
>
> Wide opened, the 77 beats my 85/1.8D, and overall the 77 has
&
Perhaps I should clarify. By "soft" I did not mean less sharp, but the
"milky" appearance. I don't know the proper way/word to describe it though.
:-(
Regards,
Alan Chan
http://www.pbase.com/wlachan
Wide opened, the 77 beats my 85/1.8D, and overall the 77 has more '3D'
look than the Nikon. So t
Some of my Nikons are too contrasty, so I know what you meant :)
Sometimes that's how Nikon got that 'very sharp' look, but when I
scanned the film, the resolution is somewhat disappointing - but does
not apply to all of them, though.
I used Nikon for 6 yrs before the first Pentax, and I found P
- Original Message -
From: "Alan Chan"
Subject: RE: 31/77 Harsh?
> Perhaps I should clarify. By "soft" I did not mean less sharp, but
the
> "milky" appearance. I don't know the proper way/word to describe it
though.
> :-(
I think the 77 h
On 9 Jun 2004 at 20:53, William Robb wrote:
> I think the 77 has very strong micro contrast, for lack of a better
> term. It seems to see very fine differences in tone, which is what
> minor skin blemishes are.
> Interestingly, on the istD, the 77 is just fine as a portait lens. I
> suspect that t
8 matches
Mail list logo
