Re: 70-2x0 zoom question

2002-08-03 Thread Alan Chan
>Auto focus is the point in this instance. I already have a nice set of >manual >focus lenses. I'm looking to move up to autofocus now. Is the Tamron AF or >MF? Manual focus also. regards, Alan Chan _ Chat with friends online,

Re: 70-2x0 zoom question

2002-08-03 Thread Andrew Robinson
Alan Chan wrote: > >In response to my queries about autofocus telephoto zooms, a couple of > >folks have recommended the Pentax 70-200 f4-5.6 F or FA lenses. Someone > >else instead recommended the Pentax 70-210 zoom. Elsewhere I found a > >comment that the 70-210 zoom is not considered highly. H

RE: 70-2x0 zoom question

2002-08-02 Thread Peter Alling
Well it does go to almost 1:2 which is true macro. It's a bit longer than a 50mm macro which gives you a bit more working distance. In all I don't think that's a bad thing in what is really a compromise lens. Especially since it's quality is surprisingly good. At 06:30 PM 8/2/2002 +0200, you w

RE: 70-2x0 zoom question

2002-08-02 Thread Peter Alling
Correction that should be earlier. At 05:40 PM 8/2/2002 +0200, you wrote: >user interface when using in macro focusing mode. The later zoom 'close >focuss' >at all focal lengths. The later 'macro focuss' only at it's shortest focal ^ I should really

RE: 70-2x0 zoom question

2002-08-02 Thread Lukasz Kacperczyk
<> Oops, didn't know about that :) Well, I kinda knew that a smaller front element meant changes in the optical design, but I was talking about the resulting pictures rather than the lenses themselves. Could you explain the difference between "close focusing" and "macro focusing"? Also, from wha

RE: 70-2x0 zoom question

2002-08-02 Thread Peter Alling
d the second - 62mm), is that the older one (67mm) has 1;2.2 >macro and the second one only 1:4 (as far as I remember). > >Lukasz > >-Original Message- >From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On >Behalf Of Peter Alling >Sent: Friday, August 02, 2002 1:15 AM &

Re: 70-2x0 zoom question

2002-08-01 Thread Fred
> Someone else instead recommended the Pentax 70-210 zoom. Elsewhere >I found a comment that the 70-210 zoom is not considered highly. The A 70-210/4 is an excellent lens. Fred - This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List. To unsubscribe, go to http://www.pdml.net and follow the directi

Re: 70-2x0 zoom question

2002-08-01 Thread Fred
> Since there are four of those it just complicates the heck out of > this discussion. I am aware of only two VS1 70-210/4 zooms. Fred - This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List. To unsubscribe, go to http://www.pdml.net and follow the directions. Don't forget to visit the Pentax Users

Re: 70-2x0 zoom question

2002-08-01 Thread Fred
> And don't forget the Vivitar Series 1 70-210 f/3.5! Of the five manual focus VS1 70-210's, the first three (f/3.5 with 67mm threads, f/3.5 with 62mm threads, and f/2.8-4 with DOF lines flaring out toward the zoom ring) appear to be very good lenses. The last two are not usually as highly regard

Re: 70-2x0 zoom question

2002-08-01 Thread Fred
> -- the venerable A 70-210/4 constant-aperture, non-autofocus, > one-touch zoom lens (considered by many to be the best zoom in > this range in terms of both optics and build quality, At least, certainly one of the best. > and a massive beast at ~150mm length and 680g mass). Hmmm... Myself, I

Re: RE: 70-2x0 zoom question

2002-08-01 Thread John Glover
- Original Message - From: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Thursday, August 01, 2002 1:23 PM Subject: Re: RE: 70-2x0 zoom question > Thanks for the help Bill. To confirm and clarify (a phrase learned at my previous job with a Fortune 100 company), I h

RE: 70-2x0 zoom question

2002-08-01 Thread Peter Alling
Since there are four of those it just complicates the heck out of this discussion. At 03:35 PM 8/1/2002 +0200, you wrote: >And don't forget the Vivitar Series 1 70-210 f/3.5! (Or is it a heresy? :) > >£ukasz >- >This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List. To unsubscribe, >go to http://ww

Re: RE: 70-2x0 zoom question

2002-08-01 Thread awrobinson
h", my next home computer will probably be a PC. Cost is the issue. Of course, this still doesn't speak to the issue of hardware compatibility. Andrew > > From: "Peifer, William [OCDUS]" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Date: 2002/08/01 Thu AM 09:02:30 EDT > To: "

RE: 70-2x0 zoom question

2002-08-01 Thread Łukasz Kacperczyk
And don't forget the Vivitar Series 1 70-210 f/3.5! (Or is it a heresy? :) Łukasz - This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List. To unsubscribe, go to http://www.pdml.net and follow the directions. Don't forget to visit the Pentax Users' Gallery at http://pug.komkon.org .

RE: 70-2x0 zoom question

2002-08-01 Thread Peifer, William [OCDUS]
Andrew Robinson wrote: > In response to my queries about autofocus telephoto zooms, a couple > of folks have recommended the Pentax 70-200 f4-5.6 F or FA lenses. > Someone else instead recommended the Pentax 70-210 zoom. > Elsewhere I found a comment that the 70-210 zoom is not considered > highly