LOL
>(Though it's probably some other dogs "business".) ;-)
Jens Bladt
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://hjem.get2net.dk/bladt
-Oprindelig meddelelse-
Fra: Don Sanderson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sendt: 4. april 2005 23:12
Til: pentax-discuss@pdml.net
Emne: RE: A more
I never look, I figure that's his business!
(Though it's probably some other dogs "business".) ;-)
Don
> -Original Message-
> From: Jens Bladt [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Monday, April 04, 2005 3:10 PM
> To: pentax-discuss@pdml.net
> Subject: RE:
Very nice. So, what did the dog find?
Jens Bladt
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://hjem.get2net.dk/bladt
-Oprindelig meddelelse-
Fra: Don Sanderson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sendt: 4. april 2005 01:57
Til: PDML
Emne: A more fun lens test!
Grab two dogs, one ist D with an A 35-70/4, take
On Apr 4, 2005, at 12:57 AM, Rob Studdert wrote:
I was hoping that someone would come to their senses and quit the lens
tests. Fer gosh sakes, doesn't anyone know how to test a lens? Use a
resolution chart, use a piece of newsprint, etc etc.
Very good advice. However some of us generally have to sh
On 3 Apr 2005 at 23:00, Godfrey DiGiorgi wrote:
> I was hoping that someone would come to their senses and quit the lens
> tests. Fer gosh sakes, doesn't anyone know how to test a lens? Use a
> resolution chart, use a piece of newsprint, etc etc.
Very good advice. However some of us generally h
On 3/4/05, William Robb, discombobulated, unleashed:
>Not very flattering of the dog, though.
My lamb likes it.
Cheers,
Cotty
___/\__
|| (O) | People, Places, Pastiche
||=|http://www.cottysnaps.com
_
On Apr 3, 2005, at 5:10 PM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Much more fun than a zillion res tests. ;-)
I agree. I went out to a nature preserve and shot some birds and deer.
Shooting is much better than testing.
I was hoping that someone would come to their senses and quit the lens
tests. Fer gosh sake
Pretty much captures his personality though. ;-)
Don
> -Original Message-
> From: William Robb [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Sunday, April 03, 2005 7:32 PM
> To: pentax-discuss@pdml.net
> Subject: Re: A more fun lens test!
> Not very flattering of the dog, though.
>
>
ing so scientific that I forget to
take some pretty pictures once in a while, I have to stop
doing that.
Don
> -Original Message-
> From: Mishka [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Sunday, April 03, 2005 8:24 PM
> To: pentax-discuss@pdml.net
> Subject: Re: A more fun l
not very useful though. kinda hard to judge anything from 400x600 pixels
web pics of arbitrary objects.
best,
mishka
On Apr 3, 2005 8:32 PM, William Robb <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> - Original Message -
> From: "Don Sanderson"
> Subject: A more fun lens test!
>
> > Grab two dogs, one
On Apr 3, 2005, at 5:32 PM, William Robb wrote:
Not very flattering of the dog, though.
Except, of course, to another dog.
-Marco
> Grab two dogs, one ist D with an A 35-70/4, take a walk,
> and take some pics.
> www.donsauction.com/pdml/Gallery/index.html
> Just snaps around the house but what a nice little lens!
> Had it for ages, never used it.
It's a really nice little lens. Except for some barrel distortion at the
wi
- Original Message -
From: "Don Sanderson"
Subject: A more fun lens test!
Grab two dogs, one ist D with an A 35-70/4, take a walk,
and take some pics.
www.donsauction.com/pdml/Gallery/index.html
Just snaps around the house but what a nice little lens!
Had it for ages, never used it.
Muc
I agree. I went out to a nature preserve and shot some birds and deer. Shooting
is much better than testing.
> Grab two dogs, one ist D with an A 35-70/4, take a walk,
> and take some pics.
>
> www.donsauction.com/pdml/Gallery/index.html
>
> Just snaps around the house but what a nice little
14 matches
Mail list logo
