Re: Agfa Portrait 160 XPS

2002-11-12 Thread Sas Gabor
Hi, On 11 Nov 2002 at 10:12, Bruce Dayton wrote: > I shot some a while back and was not that happy with it. I shot it at > 160. More recently, I was talking to an Agfa rep (complaining) and he > told me to rate it at 125. I did so and was much more pleased with > it. So based on my test and th

Re: Agfa Portrait 160 XPS

2002-11-11 Thread Bruce Dayton
Albano, I shot some a while back and was not that happy with it. I shot it at 160. More recently, I was talking to an Agfa rep (complaining) and he told me to rate it at 125. I did so and was much more pleased with it. So based on my test and the Agfa rep, you should rate it at 125. My PUG en

Re: Agfa Portrait 160 XPS

2002-11-11 Thread Jeff
Sent: Monday, November 11, 2002 9:46 AM Subject: RE: Agfa Portrait 160 XPS > Ooo.. > I'd be interested too Albano as I've got a roll of 120 itching to be put > into my MF camera. > > I know Jeff in Toronto here has used this film in the past (and I've seen > the re

RE: Agfa Portrait 160 XPS

2002-11-11 Thread [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Ooo.. I'd be interested too Albano as I've got a roll of 120 itching to be put into my MF camera. I know Jeff in Toronto here has used this film in the past (and I've seen the results - outstanding!) so I think he'll be one of the people with input on it. Oh Jeff ? :-) Cheers, Dave Original Mes