On Fri, May 22, 2009 at 09:17:03AM -0400, Adam Maas scripsit:
> On Fri, May 22, 2009 at 8:39 AM, Graydon wrote:
> > On Fri, May 22, 2009 at 02:44:04AM -0400, JC OConnell scripsit:
> >> Im not talking about the current or near future lenses,
> >> Im talking about the long run. It only makes sense t
On Fri, May 22, 2009 at 8:39 AM, Graydon wrote:
> On Fri, May 22, 2009 at 02:44:04AM -0400, JC OConnell scripsit:
>> Im not talking about the current or near future lenses,
>> Im talking about the long run. It only makes sense that
>> things that can be corrected in the body rather than
>> with op
..@pdml.net] On Behalf Of
JC OConnell
Sent: Friday, May 22, 2009 8:55 AM
To: 'Pentax-Discuss Mail List'
Subject: RE: CA correction on the K-7
things like geometry and CA can sometimes be easily corrected in
software. It doesnt necessary mean you would need higher quality control
standar
O'Connell (mailto:hifis...@gate.net)
"Honesty is the first chapter in the book of wisdom" - Thomas Jefferson
-Original Message-
From: pdml-boun...@pdml.net [mailto:pdml-boun...@pdml.net] On Behalf Of
Graydon
Sent: Friday, May 22, 2009 8:40 AM
To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List
Subject: R
On Fri, May 22, 2009 at 02:44:04AM -0400, JC OConnell scripsit:
> Im not talking about the current or near future lenses,
> Im talking about the long run. It only makes sense that
> things that can be corrected in the body rather than
> with optics may be cheaper way to go but you would have
> to u
efferson
>
>
> -Original Message-
> From: pdml-boun...@pdml.net [mailto:pdml-boun...@pdml.net] On Behalf
> Of
> Matthew Miller
> Sent: Thursday, May 21, 2009 4:47 PM
> To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List
> Subject: Re: CA correction on the K-7
>
>
> On Wed, May 2
ailto:pdml-boun...@pdml.net] On Behalf
Of
Matthew Miller
Sent: Thursday, May 21, 2009 4:47 PM
To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List
Subject: Re: CA correction on the K-7
On Wed, May 20, 2009 at 11:57:37PM -0400, John Francis wrote:
Apparently (from posts on the DPReview forum) this takes *several
second
he book of wisdom" - Thomas Jefferson
-Original Message-
From: pdml-boun...@pdml.net [mailto:pdml-boun...@pdml.net] On Behalf Of
Matthew Miller
Sent: Thursday, May 21, 2009 4:47 PM
To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List
Subject: Re: CA correction on the K-7
On Wed, May 20, 2009 at 11:57:37PM -040
On Wed, May 20, 2009 at 09:36:29PM -0700, Joseph McAllister wrote:
> I would guess that CA reduction and perspective correction could / would be
> done post capture, but prior to offloading the card. After all, all the
> information about the taking lens is there in the metadata. It's just a
> s
On Wed, May 20, 2009 at 11:57:37PM -0400, John Francis wrote:
> Apparently (from posts on the DPReview forum) this takes
> *several seconds* per exposure. Sounds hard to believe,
> but if this is true I guess it's not all that useful.
Yeah, seriously. Although the in-camera raw conversion can sti
On my Optio Z10 P&S there are several functions that are / can be made
after the fact, but must be made "in camera". These are "sharpening"
"shake reduction" and a handful of "filters" and "corrections".
I would guess that CA reduction and perspective correction could /
would be done post
11 matches
Mail list logo
