Jim Meeks wrote:
Mike, I recently read something you said on the list in regards to number
of film rolls developed at one time. I think you said something like you
were developing 3 rolls at one time and I would guess you were using a 4
roll tank. Is this so you don't put a strain on the
- Original Message -
From: "Bill D. Casselberry" [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: February 15, 2001 10:56 AM
Subject: Re: Developing B/W Film w/ Mike J.
Jim Meeks wrote:
Mike, I recently read something you said on the list in
regards to number
of film rolls
It should have no effect since the volume of developer is increased to
provide the correct amount for each roll. This works fine if each roll
requires the same processing. Problems can come about if any of the
included rolls require specialized processing in which case these should be
developed
Tom wrote.
BTW, the title of this thread sounds like a bad show on local cable.
Mike, if you read this and decide to do it, I think Tom and I should get partial
credit, at least, if not some of the residuals. Jim
-
This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List. To unsubscribe,
go to
regardless of tank capacity, it depends how much chemistry you put in, right?
I put in like 300ml per roll.
At 10:26 AM 2/15/2001 -0600, you wrote:
Mike, I recently read something you said on the list in regards to number
of film rolls developed at one time. I think you said something like you
Hi
I always use Paterson tanks. I have all sizes 1-5 rolls of 35mm film. In the
buttom of the tank is written how many ml of developer is required for 1, 2,
3, 4 or 5 rolls. I simply follow instructions (290ml/35mm roll - 500ml/120
roll). I use Ilford ID11, diluted 1+1 almost all the time. Of
6 matches
Mail list logo
