- Original Message -
From: "JC OConnell"
Subject: RE: EVFs ...too much engery consumption?
> Unless the EVF is switched on and off, which is not as good as full time
> "on" optical finder,
> I dont see how the finder power could not be an issue. LCD displ
the first chapter in the book of wisdom" - Thomas Jefferson
-Original Message-
From: pdml-boun...@pdml.net [mailto:pdml-boun...@pdml.net] On Behalf Of
Cymen Vig
Sent: Wednesday, May 13, 2009 9:38 PM
To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List
Subject: Re: EVFs ...too much engery consumption?
On T
On Tue, May 12, 2009 at 12:39 PM, JC OConnell wrote:
> wouldnt an EVF camera eat batteries even worse than flash?
>
> I dont like the fact that it consumes energy while an optical
> finder doesnt.
Battery life wasn't a problem with my Olympus C-2100 UZ. The low
resolution screen in the EVF wasn't
I have no doubt that an EVF is orders of magnitude more power hungry
than any mirror assembly...
Luiz Felipe wrote:
Well, the optical finders really are close to battery free, depending
on the amout of zooming - and assuming the finder as zoom-capable.
Taking DSLRs into account, the EVF repla
Well, the optical finders really are close to battery free, depending on
the amout of zooming - and assuming the finder as zoom-capable.
Taking DSLRs into account, the EVF replaces the entire mirror assembly,
wich would present some battery use when winding - after each shot. Add
some other bi
wouldnt an EVF camera eat batteries even worse than flash?
I dont like the fact that it consumes energy while an optical
finder doesnt.
JC O'Connell (mailto:hifis...@gate.net)
"Honesty is the first chapter in the book of wisdom" - Thomas Jefferson
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
6 matches
Mail list logo
